aq123's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 183918015 | Hi!
|
|
| 183720601 | I've deleted obviously missing tracks: changeset/186626963
|
|
| 162453121 | Откатил правку, потому что из 2ГИС нельзя копировать данные.
|
|
| 183638763 | - Duplicate amenity tags were created
|
|
| 183720601 | Hi!
|
|
| 185704760 | Пожалуйста, не объединяйте в один changeset правки в разных странах:
|
|
| 180301731 | This aerial way was already tagged with abandoned:aerialway=cable_car. And I think it's more suitable than aerialway=cable_car you've added, because the way is not functioning and really abandoned
|
|
| 180762652 | Hi!
If your intention was to specify the surface of parking spaces and bus station, I think it would be better to mark those parkings instead (with amenity=parking + surface=asphalt).
|
|
| 179303835 | Yeah, I think it'll be closer to the reality. Thanks! |
|
| 155756718 | I think it contradicts osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element According to wiki tourism=attraction is more often used as an additional tag, than as the main one. So there was no need to create duplicate POI nodes. And this tag looks like indeed a pretty subjective thing. Every museum is probably attractive for someone, but hardly it'll make any sense to tag all of them as attractions. |
|
| 155756718 | Hi!
|
|
| 179303835 | Hi!
|
|
| 170334827 | Great! Thank you for quick response and valuable contributions!
|
|
| 170334827 | Hi!
|
|
| 164034827 | Добрый день!
|
|
| 154960214 | И вам спасибо! |
|
| 154960214 | Предлагаю придерживаться вики и использовать:
|
|
| 154960214 | Какой смысл это делать заранее? building=construction
proposed:=**
|
|
| 154960214 | Добрый день!
|
|
| 151460243 | Hi Aleksandar!
|