Changeset When Comment
183918015

Hi!
I've checked the location you've tagged, a usual graves are there. Kriegsgefangenenfriedhof might be further to the West I guess, will try to find it a bit later.

183720601

I've deleted obviously missing tracks: changeset/186626963
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183720601

162453121

Откатил правку, потому что из 2ГИС нельзя копировать данные.
osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps

changeset/186193767

183638763

- Duplicate amenity tags were created
- The only amenity=college tag was deleted
- POI history was deleted

changeset/186174398

183720601

Hi!
May I know the data source of these changes?
I've tried to find the [way](way/1526643500) on the ground and saw no visible path there, just a slope with vegetation.
Some of the other ways also look very doubtful:
- way/1526643498 is completely invisible on satellite imagery and looks too steep for a track
- way/1526552650 and way/1526552651
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183720601

185704760

Пожалуйста, не объединяйте в один changeset правки в разных странах:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185704760

180301731

This aerial way was already tagged with abandoned:aerialway=cable_car. And I think it's more suitable than aerialway=cable_car you've added, because the way is not functioning and really abandoned
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180301731

180762652

Hi!
According to wiki area:highway should cover only the lanes without parkings and traffic islands:
area:highway=*?uselang=en

If your intention was to specify the surface of parking spaces and bus station, I think it would be better to mark those parkings instead (with amenity=parking + surface=asphalt).
And the bus station square with public_transport=platform + surface=asphalt:
public_transport=platform
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180762652

179303835

Yeah, I think it'll be closer to the reality. Thanks!

155756718

I think it contradicts osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

According to wiki tourism=attraction is more often used as an additional tag, than as the main one. So there was no need to create duplicate POI nodes.

And this tag looks like indeed a pretty subjective thing. Every museum is probably attractive for someone, but hardly it'll make any sense to tag all of them as attractions.

155756718

Hi!
All of these places were already tagged and some of them, like Cascade, with exactly the same tags.

179303835

Hi!
way/183249656 doesn't look like a residential one.
There is only one or two residential houses in the area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179303835

170334827

Great! Thank you for quick response and valuable contributions!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170334827

170334827

Hi!
The object you added with tag 'historic=monument' doesn't look like a monument in OSM terms, see historic=monument#Warnings
And by the way there is a historic=memorial nearby, which is obviously was added for the same object
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170334827

164034827

Добрый день!
Всё отлично, только addr:street должен быть таким же, как name соответствующей улицы:
Օրբելու փողոց
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164034827

154960214

И вам спасибо!

154960214

Предлагаю придерживаться вики и использовать:
- building=construction, если есть стены первого этажа
- proposed:building=construction, если есть высокая вероятность, что построят. В качестве критерия - например, начало продаж квартир в этом доме

154960214

Какой смысл это делать заранее?

building=construction
Вот тут прямо сказано, что этот тэг нужно использовать, когда построены хотя бы стены первого этажа.

proposed:=**
Есть ещё вот такой тэг для объектов, которых нет на местности. Но и тут предупреждают, что его использование хорошо бы предварительно обсудить с сообществом. Потому что иначе люди могут вполне справедливо удалить эти несуществующие здания.

154960214

Добрый день!
Мне кажется, жилые корпуса 4-6 ещё рано рисовать. Их ведь не начали строить и неизвестно, начнут ли когда-нибудь.
А вот контуры первых трёх уже видно на августовских снимках ESRI: https://is.gd/G87UXF

151460243

Hi Aleksandar!
I've checked the photos - you're right, it was just one of few English words on their big sign. And since there is no real name on it, I've deleted the name tag.