Hi! You've probably accidentally deleted church and building tags from way/123917278
I've reverted this part of the changeset
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190844728

It was already added:
node/14249002306
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190069319

Проверил. Нет там почты
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188977618

На https://www.haypost.am/am/our-network у 2008 отделения адрес ք. Վանաձոր, Սոխումի 14.
Точно переехали?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188977618

My five cents: in UK you've deleted a castle by removing the building tag. I guess it could have been done by agreeing with some fixes proposed by the iD editor. Now it's OK, I've reverted the change, just try to be a bit more careful in the future
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187699200

Highway restrictions mustn't be applied to a river

changeset/187653298

Hi!
I've checked the location you've tagged, a usual graves are there. Kriegsgefangenenfriedhof might be further to the West I guess, will try to find it a bit later.

I've deleted obviously missing tracks: changeset/186626963
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183720601

Откатил правку, потому что из 2ГИС нельзя копировать данные.
osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps

changeset/186193767

- Duplicate amenity tags were created
- The only amenity=college tag was deleted
- POI history was deleted

changeset/186174398

Hi!
May I know the data source of these changes?
I've tried to find the [way](way/1526643500) on the ground and saw no visible path there, just a slope with vegetation.
Some of the other ways also look very doubtful:
- way/1526643498 is completely invisible on satellite imagery and looks too steep for a track
- way/1526552650 and way/1526552651
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183720601

Пожалуйста, не объединяйте в один changeset правки в разных странах:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185704760

This aerial way was already tagged with abandoned:aerialway=cable_car. And I think it's more suitable than aerialway=cable_car you've added, because the way is not functioning and really abandoned
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180301731

Hi!
According to wiki area:highway should cover only the lanes without parkings and traffic islands:
area:highway=*?uselang=en

If your intention was to specify the surface of parking spaces and bus station, I think it would be better to mark those parkings instead (with amenity=parking + surface=asphalt).
And the bus station square with public_transport=platform + surface=asphalt:
public_transport=platform
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180762652

Yeah, I think it'll be closer to the reality. Thanks!

I think it contradicts osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

According to wiki tourism=attraction is more often used as an additional tag, than as the main one. So there was no need to create duplicate POI nodes.

And this tag looks like indeed a pretty subjective thing. Every museum is probably attractive for someone, but hardly it'll make any sense to tag all of them as attractions.

Hi!
All of these places were already tagged and some of them, like Cascade, with exactly the same tags.

Hi!
way/183249656 doesn't look like a residential one.
There is only one or two residential houses in the area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179303835

Great! Thank you for quick response and valuable contributions!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170334827

Hi!
The object you added with tag 'historic=monument' doesn't look like a monument in OSM terms, see historic=monument#Warnings
And by the way there is a historic=memorial nearby, which is obviously was added for the same object
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170334827