anglacesc's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 188458109 | Hi rajdhani, Thanks for correcting possible tagging errors, but I don't understand why I am considered to have incorrectly removed the address of an item in this changeset: changeset/188389970 I understand that it is better to add the address to the entry node of a place. So I removed the address from a way that contains a cadastral reference (way/265963124) and added it to the entry node (node/2715644422). I removed the address from the way to avoid duplication. I thought that duplicating the address was a mistake. If not, please confirm so that I don't make this mistake in the future. On the other hand, I wrote the article of this node (node/2721999768, "los Damunt") in lowercase because that is how it is indicated in the Catalan wiki: Catalan place names have articles in lowercase even if they are at the beginning of the place name: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Catalan/Criteris_ling%C3%BC%C3%ADstics It is an orthographic rule of Catalan. Finally, I removed the name "sa Bastida" from a way (way/307275224/) because "sa Bastida" is a fortification located on a mountain (https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortificaci%C3%B3_de_Sa_Bastida), it is not the name of a residential area; "sa Bastida" can also be considered the name of a place located on the outskirts of AlarĂ³ as can be seen in the IGN map layer. I understand that the node place=locality was added to indicate this place: node/1242623258/. Therefore, I considered that it did not make sense to keep the name "sa Bastida" within a residential area. Many thanks and good mapping |