> Pouzivat na to bicycle:practical=yes mne vadit nebude, ale mozno tym Rusom, co tu znacku vymysleli, kedze vase pouzitie je v rozpore s jej popisom na wiki (prelozil som si to).

Zrejme ten preklad nebol správny, lebo v rozpore to nie je. Je to trochu inak používane ale stále vyznám tagu je rovnaký: bicyklabilnosť.

Myslím si že Michal s touto charakteristikou prehnal, ale upload duplicitných neoverených a nekorektných dát a vymazanie správnych nie je dobrý postup.

Hi @MartinNagyMN, this import has not been co-ordinated with the community, and is not done properly.

Could you please revert and join the discussion in osm_sk@googlegroups.com?

Thanks!

Hi @MartinNagyMN, this import has not been co-ordinated with the community, and is not done properly.

Could you please revert and join the discussion in osm_sk@googlegroups.com?

Thanks!

I could have made a mistake or looked at a different changeset, but I cannot find the ways I've seen.

Strange, I cannot see them anymore.

As far as I can see there are multiple ways which aren't part of any relations and don't have any tags.

Hi,

This changeset of yours seems to add a lot of nonsense data, such as ways with invalid tags or without tags at all.

Could you please verify and fix it?

Thanks!

Hi,

You seem to have added a lot of meaningless tags to way/507084935/history…

Please check the data you upload to make sure this doesn't happen in future :)

Thanks!

Could you please make sure you don't add meaningless tags such as yes=yes next time? :)

Thanks!

Please make sure you don't add meaningless tags like yes=no next time.

Thanks!

We don't map official names though, do we? The street sign on this street says Ulica.

Nepatrí. Mažem.

Erm, why?

If there's no source for the park name, I will have to remove it, at least until it is officially confirmed (or not).

Hi Maťo,

What is the source for the park name? I was unable to find any evidence it is in fact named like that during the survey on the location.

Thanks!

I haven't noticed that. I only noticed bunglow because I was watching http://osmlab.github.io/show-me-the-way/.

Indeed, I haven't noticed that.

Hi,

Thanks for your edits.

According to building=bungalow, it should be building=bungalow, not building=bunglow (sic: missing "a").

It would be great if you used the correct spelling for your future edits.

Obviously it isn't. Yet it's necessary to pay more attention when reverting changes contributed using it.