aighes's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177182550 | 2 days ago | osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide
Btw. the new 2025 Oakland County aerials are out, which you might want to use instead of the 2023 version. Though seems iD hasn't updated the default layers yet |
| 177182550 | 2 days ago | Hey Trail_Caretaker,
I fixed this in changeset/177200060. |
| 177143889 | 3 days ago | You might as well join the discussion on: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sidewalk-on-cyclepath/138915/18 |
| 177143889 | 3 days ago |
Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk. Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one. |
| 177143603 | 3 days ago | Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk. Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one. |
| 177149633 | 3 days ago | I don't care which key used for the timezones in Germany, but please keep the standard time zone as well as the dst-zone. |
| 176723605 | 4 days ago | @EvanSiroky, it seems you are not plannign to remove that historcal data, so I did it for you. |
| 176723605 | 14 days ago | Hey EvanSiroky, OSM is not the proper location to store historical data. Please remove this relation. You might want to maintain it within OHM project. See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/time-zone-boundaries/76086/35 |
| 175414472 | about 1 month ago | |
| 165154929 | 9 months ago | Danke für deinen Hinweis. Habe das Problem soeben behoben. |
| 162891782 | 10 months ago | Hallo OMME-OSM,
|
| 162208739 | 11 months ago | Hey OMME-OSM,
|
| 156081738 | 12 months ago | Wäre super, wenn du deine Änderungen mit einer ordentliche Beschreibung versehen würdest, sodass man weiß, was du geändert hast. "Ist so" ist da wenig hilfreich. Danke. |
| 161542455 | 12 months ago | Hey, bitte schaue doch beim nächsten Mal, wenn du Wege verbindest auch nach den Relationen. Du hast mit dem Zusammenführen der Kreisverkehre diverse Busrelationen kaputt gemacht. |
| 154162314 | about 1 year ago | Discussion continues here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/us-route-relations/122274 |
| 159509725 | about 1 year ago | Thanks for the hint. I updated the areas accordingly. |
| 154162314 | about 1 year ago | route=bicycle#Members
|
| 154162314 | about 1 year ago | You don't need superduperroute. superroute contains relations, route contains ways and nodes (aka geometry). It's not about hierarchy of different levels. |
| 154162314 | about 1 year ago | Maybe I'm misunderstand osm.wiki/Relation:route#Members but at least as I read it, a route-relation suppose to contains ways and nodes, only the role "information" is intended for relations. |
| 159509725 | about 1 year ago | Do you have a better fit? For me village_green was the best fit. |