Hey PowerMapper77,
I assume the data you added with this (and the once for the other states) was an import and you haven't reviewed them one by one? If so, such imports need to follow the Import Guidelines: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Did you started the required discussion ahead of your import? If not, I suggest to start such kind of discussion as soon as possible and stop any further imports.

I believe most of the "names" you added in name might be not actual names, but rather the operator?

Was this automated edit somewhere discussed?

Was this automated edit somewhere discussed?

Hey Mitesh, you might want to add what kind of POI exist in that location and not only its name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178789533

Hey Jeff, if that building is an fire station, you might want to add amenity=fire_station
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178789239

Hey, is there any reason why you deleted the object and replaced it with node/13577767503 with poor positioning and less information?

Hey ratrun,
I can see you deleted a couple of ways, which were added just 2 days ago by a fellow mapper based on GPX tracks. Have you been there within the last days and can provide any more recent sources why you think those ways are not existent?

Otherwise I kindly ask you to restore those ways. Have a nice day.

Not sure what you mean by messy. They were matching to the latest HiRes aerials from Oakland County. If you spot something odd and are not interested in fixing it with the same level of detail, feel free to add notes.

For sure, I just reverted those changes to the road geometry. The rest of your clean up in the area looked good to me, so I didn't touch them.

Hey Hyposometic, please stop with your deletion and simplification of OSM data. In several changesets you replaced detailed turning cycles with simplified notes. That's not appreciated. I will revert those changesets.

osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide
gives a good description on sidewalks, crossings and related stuff.

Btw. the new 2025 Oakland County aerials are out, which you might want to use instead of the 2023 version. Though seems iD hasn't updated the default layers yet

Hey Trail_Caretaker,
it seems, you have joined in this change set a couple of ways, which had different tags. Especially the cycleway along Long Lake Road was split in sections to separate the sidepath from the crossing sections.

I fixed this in changeset/177200060.

You might as well join the discussion on: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sidewalk-on-cyclepath/138915/18

Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk.

Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one.

Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk.

Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one.

I don't care which key used for the timezones in Germany, but please keep the standard time zone as well as the dst-zone.

@EvanSiroky, it seems you are not plannign to remove that historcal data, so I did it for you.

Hey EvanSiroky, OSM is not the proper location to store historical data. Please remove this relation. You might want to maintain it within OHM project.

See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/time-zone-boundaries/76086/35

Siehe:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sind-hinweise-mit-driveways-wurden-noch-nicht-eingetragen-verboten/138372/53

Danke für deinen Hinweis. Habe das Problem soeben behoben.

Hallo OMME-OSM,
gab es einen Grund die Stopposition von Node node/3002554833 zu entfernen? Bitte in Zukunft etwas vorsichtiger vorgehen bei deinen Bearbeitungen. Danke!