Hi, please write your sources next time, thanks.

Thanks for the additions. But when you separated turning lanes into separate roads on junction of R2 and 16 (correct, as there are islands), you have to update the 'lanes' and "turn:lanes" and also all the *:forward *:backward tags so that they match the new situation. After your change the tags are wrong and misleading causing wrong routing or navigation instructions.
You just split existing roads but did not update the tags so many now-invalid ones remained.

You also forgot to add turning restrictions as now from some of the branches it is not possible to turn into any direction (like left and right). Also you split the roads too soon, when there is still possible to change lanes (there is no physical barrier between the lanes), see the examples at lanes=* and osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement .

I have fixed it after you (see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178546094 ) and please do these junctions properly if you are doing this all over the world and in such quantities.

Zdravim, je zastavka node/9641488744 rovnaka ako node/3439000745 ? A to iste na druhej strane cesty.

it is now in bus relation...

Good catch. It is not in bus relation, it is used.

No veru, bol som to pozriet a je to dost inak ako v OSM, ulica je spojena a pomedzi stlpiky sa da prejst napr. bicyklom. Ani tam uz nie je zakaz vjazdu mot.vozidiel okrem zasobovanie. Opravil som.

Thanks, but you didn't need to remove the old names of the cafe.

Dobre, ale naozaj su tam dva rady stlpikov, kolme na cestu a medzi nimi medzera s nejakou prekazkou, cez ktoru sa neda prejst? Ked tie dve casti Satinskeho nie su spojene (v jednom bode so stlpikom).

Zdravim, naco je toto dobre? Preco relacia v relacii? Je potrebnych tolko urovni, ked maju len jedneho clena?
A preco maju oba useky (BA-Rajka a BA-Wolfsthal) rovnakeho clena?

Tiez by mozno nezaskodilo do tych jednotlivych relacii pridat znacku stage (stage=*) aby sa ujasnilo poradie.

Hi, please do not change shapes of buildings marked source=kapor2 as those are from the Slovak cadastre, unless you use the cadastre map and you see the building has changed. You do not qoute this source. Some building parts cannot be seen properly on Ortofotomozaika SR.

Also the swimming_pools do not need an area=yes tag. But they are all private so should have been tagged access=private and swimming_pool=personal. Without these tags, this is just a giant heap of public pools.

Zdravim, naco duplicitne cvicisko way/1370342241, ked uz je tam node/9941023133 ?

Hi, adding level does not solve any problems.
The road isn't at level 1 of the building, most of it isn't even in any building, thus 'level' tags is nonsense.
You probably wanted to use 'layer' tag.

Please learn about the tags before you start to work on any maproulettte tasks.

Hi, what kind of correction is this? "website:2" key? The website wiki page mentions "website:1" if you want to go that way. "website:brand" definitely seemed better as a way to mark how the brand network references this pharmacy.

Zdravim, z coho vyplyvaju tieto nazvy zastavok?
Aky je zdroj iscp sk? Mame povolenie z neho cerpat udaje pre OSM?
Su to oficialne nazvy dopravcu, ako su na tabulkach ci cestovnom poriadku? A preco ste zmenili len 2 nastupistia "Sered, Nam. Slobody) ked ich je tam viac a este ste to urobili so roznym zapisom (s ciarkou ci bez). Nezmenili sa rovnako vsetky nastupistia? Podobne napr. Sered,Priemyselna ste zmenili len na jednej strane ceste. V opacnom smere sa zastavka nepremenovala?

Zdravim, podla poznamky note/4792897 sa stavba ma volat uplne inak. Podla coho je to dnes Eclaire? Nezaskodilo by pridavat na tieto stavby znacku website s popisom projektu. Dakujem

A na Satinskeho ulici naozaj odstranili ten plot (branu) a da sa tam uz volne prechadzat (chodcom) ?

Zdravim, dakujem za doplnenie staveniska. Budova stanice je vsak stale vidiet na vsetkych leteckych snimkach a je aj v katastri, takze v takom pripade existujuci objekt nemazeme uplne, ale zmenime znacku building=* na removed:building=* a odstranime znacky, ktore uz nie su aktualne (nazov, ci vyska budovy). Tak ako to mozete vidiet na cestach byvalych nastupist autobusovej stanice.
Vyhnete sa tym pripadu, ze niekto (co tam zrovna vcera nebol) budovu znovu prida, kedze vo vsetkych zdrojoch je. Dakujem

A ak tvrdite (v inej sade zmien), ze cesty upravujte, aby Vam presnejsie vychadzali vzdialenosti v navigacii, tak napr. vyrovnanim Mileticovej idete proti tomuto cielu, kedze v niektorych usekoch kopirovala stredovu ciaru, teda aj jazdne pruhy isli pori nej a teda aj vozidlo pojde tak "parkinsonicky" a pridaju sa mu nejake metre. Toto ste znicili. Samozrejme tiec po Vasich upravach nesedia znacky "placement" na nove umiestnenie cesty.
Taktiez napr. vyrovnanie cyklocesty way/1381679932 je asi nespravne, kedze v skutocnosti je taka kriva. Potvrdzuju to aj snimky. Cize zase zmena, co viac skodi ako nieco prinasa.
Rovnako node/7926291575 ste posunuli na nespravne miesto (vidiet na Ortofoto).

Uplne nespravne zrusenie ciest ako way/1243709752 a way/1243709753 a ich zlucenie do jednej cesty way/204023833, hoci mali rozne znacky a rozny pristup vozidiel. Nova cesta absolutne nezodpoveda dopravnym znackam na mieste a zablokovali ste pristup ku garazam, parkovisku a jednej ulici.

Cize asi len halabala vyrovnavate, len aby ste vyrovnavali, bez ohladu na realitu a na nejaky prinos pre navigaciu (ktory aj tak nema zmysel a je v OSM zakazany ked optimalizujete pre jeden typ vozidla a jednu navigaciu).

Dakujem, ako plocha mozno OK, ale pesia zona to nie je (nie su tam take znacky). Co bolo nespravne na footway ?
Preco bolo treba odstranit chodnicky ako way/1056987372 a potom ich znovu nakreslit ako way/1460603325 ale uz so stratenou znackou 'fixme' ?
Cesty ako way/1300105405 su indoor=yes, takze nie su tunelom.
Zabudli ste skratit way/1300105404, aby bola uz len vovnutri budovy po vychod.
A znovu zbytocne odstranene schody way/1460603326 a nahradene way/1460603326 so stratou znaciek. To iste aj na druhych schodoch.
Stlpiky ako node/13171982912 teraz stratili akukolvek funkciu, kedze plocha je okolo nich a teda navigacia pusti akekolvek vozidlo do tejto pesej zony a obide stlpiky.
Aha vlastne tam nepusti nikoho ani chodcov, kedze ste plochu odpojili od chodnika way/211711091. Esteze zo zapadnej strany ste na to nezabudli (way/1460603324).
To, ze pesia zona na mnohych miestach zasahuje do budovy lebo ste do nej nezahrnuli vsetky body budov, ktore kopiruje (napr. node/766632513), to uz je najmensi problem.

I think all the garages have a flat roof, not skillion. If there is some very slight slope towards the back of the building, it should be specified more precisely e.g. using roof:angle.