Please do not hide place= reclassifications in more subtle changeset comments.

Please be more specific in changeset comments. "Made a minor adjustment" is not an appropriate comment for reclassifying a place.

Please do not make any further place classification changes in New England before discussing it at:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/broad-undiscussed-new-england-place-name-reclassification/111201

Discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/broad-undiscussed-new-england-place-name-reclassification/111201/44

I've reverted this per private access restrictions described by residents as documented on osm.wiki/Rhode_Island/Hog_Island
Please open a discussion on https://community.openstreetmap.org/ before making further changes to private roads. Linked map on the prior changeset does not have any indication of access restrictions.

changeset/153063260

Changeset reverted due to no trespassing sign that I observed during survey.

changeset/152823038

Hello, can you explain why you made this short dead-end road a trunk road?
way/601312224

Have you reviewed this wiki page?
osm.wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance

Thanks guys! I'm headed out there at some point this summer. It sounds like a lot has changed since the last time I went out there.

Where are you getting these street names in southern Prudence Island from? Did you personally visit and observe street signs here?

Hello, this and similar edits are being discussed on the community forum at this link:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/concerns-about-azerbaijan/113039/

I invite the changeset author to join the discussion.

What is the source of this edit?

I think this is supposed to be boundary=national_park instead of boundary=protected_area + protected_area=national_park. Do you agree?

Not quite sure how that happened but I agree the nodes should be merged

See discussion I just opened at

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/boundary-tagging-on-boundary-relation-member-ways/111345

This change is not correct. boundary and admin_level should not be set on boundary member ways. They should only be applied to boundary relations.

For example way/37572312

Well that was two years ago, but likely deleted it for not being a city (it seems to be a section of Missoula, Montana).

I dropped a note on Slack in the Montana channel to see if these neighborhood boundaries should be mapped in the hierarchy.
https://app.slack.com/client/T029HV94T/CDN6LLF37

What is "Site input" ?

Ugh ok thanks for catching this

Might need to be tagged as a historic route. I'm not sure what the on the ground situation is

Which of the 1200 relations are you referring to?