Generating addr:city from local authority names is offered as an option in iD.

Why did you remove the fax number from way/1376766484?

Have you followed the [organised editing guidelines](https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines)

As I previously posted to changeset/171046562 what are you doing?

What are you doing?

These pavements are buttjoined onto the road traversably. We don’t map lanes of roads separately, how are these any different? Also one participant to this conversation has been making unhelpful edits.

Isn’t that tagging for the renderer?

You really should be using your position to set an example to other mappers instead of trolling the database like this.

The addr:housename tag formed an address with the other addr: tags that can be used to address the houses. Using name instead loses the context of forming addresses.

Why did you remove addressing information (addr:housename)?

Kneller Hall has been sold off and is being converted to a school.

Did you mean to use the tag service=driveway2?

What are you trying to do?

I notice you used cycleway=opposite. Some mappers dislike that tag and want to discourage it.

osm.wiki/Proposal:Deprecate_cycleway%3Dopposite_family
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-deprecate-cycleway-opposite-family/113560

Your changes to Bornholm were not confined to Spanish. Was that intentional?

One thing you could do is add an icon with a Wikipedia link to every Wikidata tag in the tag list on the web site.

This changeset uses the obsolete tag waterway=riverbank instead of the now-preferred natural=water water=river. Some newer renderers such as OpenStreetMap Americana don’t recognise it.

Reverted in changeset/138535327.

Reverted in changeset/138535266.

I notice you have done a number of edits like this. Could you explain what was wrong with the previous tagging?