WashuOtaku's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 124362863 | I have no idea why you claim that I lied about you, your explanation is not satisfactory and I do not understand why there are different set of (unwritten) standards for OSM despite what is factual. There is a field for population and that too was filled. Also, there is an airport within Soda Springs city limits, which is a major amenities in your example. |
|
| 124362863 | @Allison P, the city of Soda Springs identifies itself as a city, so does Wikipedia and the state of Idaho. Unless you can explain it is not, it is a city. |
|
| 113698298 | Why is the Metropolitan missing? |
|
| 106685662 | Why has the golf course been shrunk to a small triangle? If this was a mistake, you should correct it. |
|
| 107651070 | You are using the park code incorrectly. The "Cherry Tree Save" is not a recognized park and should not be tagged as such. If it is, I recommend sources next time. |
|
| 75338359 | You obviously have not traveled along the Blue Ridge Parkway, because it is designed and manicured. |
|
| 75338359 | I was unaware you had the statistics on that, please share or STFU. |
|
| 65989890 | My recommendation in future is to use "parking lanes" for the parking lots, not "service lanes." I do not like cleaning up because people don't understand the difference. |
|
| 58418610 | There is no YMCA here, it is a church. Please do not make erroneous edits in OSM. |
|
| 58419089 | I'm reversing this edit because it is not a park nor a sports complex. |
|
| 58418810 | I have reversed your edits. Apartment amenities are not the same as a valid park, which is usually open to all and operated by a government or 3rd party. |
|
| 56051057 | I have reversed your edit on Squirrel Lake Park because the wooded area was to identify the wooded area inside the park, which was already mapped. |
|
| 55818405 | The greenways are overlapping with other parks. Next step is to adjust those borders so they no longer overlap, otherwise good job. |
|
| 49019040 | I-587 is a future designation, it is not an active route, thus should not be listed. |