Changeset comment should be
Resolve 'Moore Guy' from relation into simple way.
Source - OSMInspector, OSM, bing

Hi,
Why have you marked Charters Towers Aerodrome as military?
It was constructed for military purposes .. but now?
Looks like it is controlled by hte local council - they collect landing fees & charges...
https://www.charterstowers.qld.gov.au/Services/Facilities-and-services/Airports-airstrips

Hi,
Issue with Relation: Bingera Conservation Park 1 (1506713)...

This looks to be a gliders airfield - North Gregory/Elliott Field https://www.pilotnav.com/airport/YETT

Primarily used by https://gliding.inbundy.com.au/gliding/

Maybe it is 'used ' for both ???

----------- I have also raised this on changeset/106895639

Hi,
Issue with Relation: Bingera Conservation Park 1 (1506713)...

This looks to be a gliders airfield - North Gregory/Elliott Field https://www.pilotnav.com/airport/YETT

Primarily used by https://gliding.inbundy.com.au/gliding/

Maybe it is 'used ' for both ???

Changeset comment should be
Add Caboolture Gliding Club. Add some buildings, fences. Expand parking from node to area.

The relation for the Smallwood Estate is not how it was originally mapped. I like this one better. But as a 1 member relation it can be simplified - put the relationship tags on the way and delete the relation.

Hi,
Should not the interval be on the ferry route relations not on the individual segments? Some segments are used by different routes.. thus could be confusing???

Yay!
Looks like it complies with 'the rules'.

14 days
no response.

Hi,
relation/20274479 - heath has a problem Outer ways cannot share segments. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=169.37918&lat=-45.19754&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I'd delete the relation. Then put the tag 'natural=heath' and be done. No need for as relation at all.

way/1483880053 has a node or 2 that are causing problems...
See way/1483880053

Name is for name only, not a description eg 'Terrace Houses'.

relation/19448184 deleted - shared segments.

What is the 'Smallwood Estate'?

Looks to me like these group of building are individual properties that can be purchased individually .. with individual; addresses. Perhaps they were developed as a lot but once sold this 'estate' ceased to be?

In any case the relation has no outer so it does not make OSM sense.

Deleted relation/19927055 - 2 members both inners.

Errr No.

Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments.

In principle the surface parking would be part of the mall too.

I'd put a simple way around the hole outside of the block and put the tags on that .. depending on the OSM definition of 'mall'?
Alternative? Put a simple way around the outside of all of the buildings and tags on that.

Thoughts?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The multipolygon grass relation is in error ... the outer ways cannot share segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.57355&lat=-37.70232&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The simplest thing to do?
Delete the relation.
Place the tag 'landuse=grass' on each way

Hi,
I have been adding gliding clubs to OSM.

To 'conform' to OSM tags .. I have removed 'clubhouse' from the name of one of the buildings and added tags for club, sport and website.
The aim is to make them all searchable using club and gliding.
A few missing as I cannot yet get even a rough location for them.

In this case there is only one mapped way around the whole thing ... with all of the tags on that. No relation.

If the individual segments require separation then add separate ways as building:part. Still no relation.

Shared segments in relation...

Learn how to do multipolygon relations .... ...................................................................................................

Relation relation/19795228 deleted - conflicts with
address nodes.
separation of buildings
only has role 'inners'.