Ce fixme là, c'est pour les caméras qui, au moment de l'import, ont été inventorié sur sous-surveillance.com il y a plus de 10 ans. Pour la date d'inventorisation, il y a le champ: survey:date

ok, oui. J'ai fait une partie du travail en amont mais effectivement il en reste pour atteindre le standard de OSM

Vu notre usage de Vespucci lors de nos balades cartographiques c'est sans doute une erreur sur l'adresse. J'ai enlevé l'adresse erronée: osm.org/edit?node=8589606002#map=21/50.84054/4.33920

Hi Bxl-forever,

I have changed the operator to the name of the next by restaurant which is more probable than the lawyers (camera is pointing to the entrance of the restaurant)

The Technopolice_newBiE account is used by OSM newbie during our walks in the city https://carto.technopolice.be/?accueil=balade

Vucod

Hi Pieter,

It is an account used by our new mappers when we do our walks to map social control elements (https://carto.technopolice.be/ --> tab: walking person, I should add a direct link :-D)

I fixed the location and feedback was send to the mapper.

I gave him the link. Based on your question, I suppose that I need to use this one now https://pietervdvn.github.io/MapComplete/surveillance :-D.

Note that in our new website we will link to this new url.

Vucod

ok, I suppose you mean node/5747670946. I checked the permits. The Orange antenna(s) are indeed in the close by site (ref:BE:BIPT: 12251, node/5747670946). It is fixed now

Thanks. You can see more details here also: osm.wiki/Wikiproject_Belgium/Infrastructure/BIPT_antennas. Don't hesitate if you have comments

The values of the key operator have been updated: changeset/83423424#map=10/51.0097/4.5716

Hello,

I inform that someone can lye on the bench.
In case of doubts, this can be verified when doing survey, by lying on the bench.
This could also be determined most of the time by looking at 3 things.
The length of the bench, the presence of an "inner" separation on the bench between different seats and by checking if it is a standing bench.
Note that length was refused as an official key for bench and that the key for the separation doesn't exist (armrest does not specifically concern the inner part of the bench).

There has been some discussions over the years:
- https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/avbmsb/is_there_a_preferred_way_of_mapping_possible/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/8rs7zf/how_to_map_antihomeless_bench/
- osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dbench#sleeping.3Dyes.2Fno

but with no conclusion. I think this has repelled people to map that. Today, there is nearly no such information in OSM. Maybe it is because it not its place?
Nobody expressed that clearly. So, I started to use this key as I wanted to map that information. I'm aware that it is better if I document it and start some discussions in the tagging mailing list among others.
I had planned to do it later when a few are mapped.

But now that we have opened the discussion, do you think that lying_hindrance=yes could be better? Or with 3 value options (armrest, short_length, stand_up_bench)?

I look forward to have your opinion or even suggestions.

Vucodil

Hello,
there is no reason to keep it like this. The info where collected outside of OSM by french speaking people.

That's the list of operators used in this dataset:

- Zone de Police 5339 - Bruxelles CAPITALE Ixelles
- Bruxelles Prévention et Sécurité (BPS) - Zone de Police 5340 - Bruxelles Ouest - Zone de Police 5344 - Bruxelles Nord - Zone de Police 5341 - Bruxelles Midi - Police fédérale
- Administration communale d'Uccle - MOBIRIS
- Administration communale de Woluwe-Saint-Lambert
- Administration Communale Koekelberg - Commune de Berchem Sainte Agathe - Zone de Police 5343 - Bruxelles Montgomery
- Commune d'Etterbeek
- Commune de Woluwe-Saint-Pierre - Administration communale de Jette - Zone de Police 5339 - Bruxelles CAPITALE Ixelles
- Polbru
- Bruxelles
- Administration communale de Ganshoren - Dilbeek
- Schaerbeek
- Sint-Pieters-Leeuw
- Overijse + Police fédérale - Centre Hospitalier Jean Titeca - Zone de Police 5340 - Bruxelles Ouest - Bruxelles Prévention et Sécurité (BPS) - Woluwé
- Administration communale d'Uccle
- Admnistration communale d'Ixelles
- Etterbeek

I could update the operator tags of the dataset with a mapping (on the not changed nodes) but I'm not sure about every translation

ok, merci pour les conseils. J'avais effectivement vu que les scissions de chemins que j'ai effectué cassaient des relations. J'en ai réparé avant de soumettre mes changements mais visiblement j'en ai oublié. Je vais analyser mes modifications pour voir si il y en a d'autres. Encore merci

I should have added that the info in this map had been completed by a survey. But I grant you that one was imprecisely placed.

Parfait, merci !

Merci encore pour tous ces conseils ! Encore quelques questions concernant ton changeset https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66037931/?aoi=7c2bf89b-56b8-42bf-8bd5-dc9b6ad9ba60 . Pourquoi tu as supprimé quelques maisons ? Et les références des arbres et châteaux, tu les trouves où ?

Thanks for the reviewing and for the explanations