Hello!

Multiple government agencies, including BMRCL, BMTC and DULT, have an office within the Shantinagar TTMC building complex. It seems some of those government office nodes got deleted in these changesets, so I have restored them in a follow up changeset.

Regards,
Vonter

Hello!

While the crossover track is not shown in the linked alignment image, it does indeed exist and is used for transferring trains between the Green Line and Purple Line. Whenever a Green Line train appears on the Purple Line, it gets on to the Purple Line using this crossover track.

I have reverted this changeset and added back the crossover track.

Regards,
Vonter

The original tracing of areas like the water area was done based on the master plan of the development. I guess they ended up not creating the water features as originally planned in the master plan.

In that case, it would make sense to remove them from the map and instead add whatever ended up being built on ground in that location. In this case, to me it looks like a garden of sorts, based on satellite imagery. If that looks correct to you as well, I would go ahead and map it as such.

If there is absolutely no physical trace of a drain in the area, then deleting it would be the right way to go. I believe in this case it is more likely that there is a minor seasonal drain, but it may not be easily evident from aerial imagery. I've retraced the way based on what I think seems to be a possible path, in the aerial imagery, that the drain follows: way/1092941900

Some of the drain way elements were traced approximately and may not match the exact path of water flow. It probably matches it somewhat, but since these drains tend to be seasonal, they may not always be visible in aerial imagery.

Hello

Hello. Thanks for pointing out the error. Looks like that should have been in the `name` tag as "Shristhi Village". I've fixed it in changeset/171763717

Thanks for reviewing this! The `315` was supposed to be the value for the `camera:direction` tag. I've fixed this in the changeset: changeset/171209553

Hello, thanks for the comment. From what I've seen, names are often updated on OpenStreetMap when the government officially notifies the change by publishing it in the Gazette. However, feel free to revert the change if you believe keeping the old name would be more appropriate in this case.

Hello.

You are right, the village shouldn't be mapped as a single residential area. The ideal way to map the village would be to draw each plot boundary separately and tag them appropriately.

For a starting point, however, I think this kind of mapping is alright. It might make sense to add an additional "residential=rural" tag to indicate that it is a village, but since this village has some urban characteristics, I often don't end up adding that tag.

Overall, drawing polygons with`residential=rural` specifically for the residential section of the village is the goal.

Hello, thank you for the contribution! As this playground is within a residential "gated community", would it be more appropriate to tag it as `access=private`, rather than `access=yes` like it is currently tagged?

Cool. Thanks for the link!

Hello! Thank you for the contribution!
Do you happen to have a source which mentions about an operational Inter-Corridor Line for which new relations were created in this changeset? I don't seem to be able to find a mention of it on the Wikipedia page.

Looks good, thanks!

In that case, I believe the new route relation should include the terminal station name either in the `to` tag or as part of the `name` tag. Additionally, it would be good to add it to the BMTC `network` relation: relation/8591663

Hello, it appears the KIA-5 relation added in this changeset is a duplicate of an existing relation: relation/17327848

If there is an error in the original relation, it might make sense to edit the original one instead of creating a new relation.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the OSM Bengaluru group:

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the regional OSM groups:

OSM Bengaluru

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

OSM India

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSMIndia

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-in-general:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the OSM Bengaluru group:

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!

Changeset comment should be "Delhi: Trace buildings and landuse from imagery"