Can you verify?

Reverted it all using https://revert.monicz.dev/

From the discussion I had here the conclusion was to tag waste baskets and street lamps as two different nodes for now
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/discussion-of-restructuring-of-amenity-waste-basket-and-bin-yes/114962

Hey! Do you have an example of what isn't done correctly?

I checked a few just now and they all look correct. We could revert my whole changeset if need be

overpass query used

node[amenity=waste_basket][https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=street_lamp]({{bbox}});
out meta;

Correction, I only reverted the crane. Sorry for the confusion (figured I'd try the revert tool for the first time)

After the reconstructions of Södra Hamn we moved it further west*

I reverted this because the Bing map is very outdated. After the reconstructions of Södra Hamn we

changeset/152896104

Or rather, in ruins

In this case to me it clearly looks removed on aerial imagery

Looks good! One thing to add with destroyed buildings it's better to remove it completely
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152474504

Using Esri myself and on iD at least it doesn't look like we need to edit the offset. Especially if you add in GPS tracks. Looking at Ronningsvägen 25, that building is very easy to spot being off-center when offset is set correctly. There are a few of us in the forums, mailing list, and Discord if you want to ask for thoughts there!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150462700

Using Esri myself and on iD at least it doesn't look like we need to edit the offset. Especially if you add in GPS tracks. Looking at Ronningsvägen 25, that building is very easy to spot being off-center when offset is set correctly. There are a few of us in the forums, mailing list, and Discord if you want to ask for thoughts there!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150462700

Hi gibbles! Thanks for adding the houses but seems like the aerial imagery you used wasn't aligned properly. To me this doesn't seem aligned correctly, something to keep in mind for the future
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150462700