OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
158343548 about 1 year ago

Hi cubbe8,

Thanks for getting back to me and for the explanation. That makes sense.
Thanks,
-Nick

158343548 about 1 year ago

Hi Cubbe8,
Thanks for reaching out!
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "Not a separated bike lane". I mapped the cycleway features because I do see bike lanes in aerial imagery (dated 2023) and in Bing ground imagery.
Also, my edits were connecting existing crossing nodes that were already mapped over the mentioned cycleway. These nodes were left in place after ways I had added were deleted. Are these remaining nodes (with the tags I added) duplicates of the pedestrian crossing nodes? Or are they intended for the bike lane?
Hope to hear from you soon.
Best,
Nick

157986120 about 1 year ago

Hi amarylis rodriguez!
I noticed that all the buildings in this changeset contain highway and slipway tags. I'm wondering if you would be willing to revert this changeset or fix all the issues.
Thanks!
-Nick

153469981 over 1 year ago

Hi rskedgell,

Thank you for the edits to the crossings! I greatly appreciate you for letting me know Have a good day!

Best,
Nick

152810510 over 1 year ago

Hello there cnvery!
I noticed that you named this building as “Illegal House”.
Are you able to provide more information about this addition?
Thank you and have a good day!
-Nick

152914235 over 1 year ago

Hello OxidizingMap,
I noticed that you added this jewelry store and their hideaway building.
I’m curious if having their hideaway building labeled as such, might raise security/other issues?
Thank you and have a nice day!
-Nick

152991978 over 1 year ago

Hi mboeringa,
I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. I didn’t notice that this node was part of a larger boundary relation. I noticed that the tag was removed in changeset/143605371 back in November- https://osmcha.org/changesets/143605371. That is what prompted me to look into it, and I found that source I linked my changeset comment. I’ll add back the level 2 admin.
Thank you again, please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns. Have a good day!
-Nick

153470257 over 1 year ago

Hey there rskedgell,
I appreciate you reaching out and for bringing this to my attention! I made those updates and will be sure to keep this info in mind for future edits.
Have a great day!
-Nick

152726018 over 1 year ago

Hi dmich9,
I noticed that Dubawnt Lake was broken into 3 different relations with a gap after your import. Is this a work in progress or do you mind if I combine the 3 into one?
Thanks!
-Nick

152463665 over 1 year ago

Hello spiregrain!
I noticed that a foot=yes tag was added to way/868180765.
It seems that having the foot=yes on that small cycleway doesn’t offer connectivity for pedestrians. That road section does have the appropriate sidewalk tag though and I went ahead and added them. I was wondering if you would be open to me removing the foot=yes tag from way/868180765?
Thank you for your time, and have a great day!

151019892 over 1 year ago

Hello Alyssa Chance,
You are correct about one of the ways that has since been changed. When adding a way to close a multipolygon, I must have expanded off of Zunkman’s geometry which copied those incorrect tags over.
I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
Please reach out if you have any more concerns.

149822148 over 1 year ago

Hello Enock4seth! Thank you for reaching out to me about this issue. I apologize for not reaching out to further discuss what the situation was in this area regarding the personal information on these buildings. I was following the guideline listed here osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information on the OSM wiki about privacy standards. Would you recommend we revert these changes to include the names in this case? As far as the building QA issue, the project I was working with mainly involves tagging on the name tags, and if you'd like to know more of our editing processes you may find that here osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta.

Thank you again for bringing this to my attention, and please feel free to reach out to me again with anymore questions, comments, or concerns!

150133891 over 1 year ago

Hello gscholz. I went in and fixed a couple of those issues (changeset/150235699), but I think you may have meant to comment on a different changeset? I noticed that the issues you pointed out were generated by one of Grannymeg’s changesets: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150028245.
The edits I made in the area can be seen here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150133891.
Thank you for reaching out and have a good day!

136183070 almost 2 years ago

Hi @ivanbranco, thank you for the information!

136183070 almost 2 years ago

Hi Superadlen. I noticed that there are a lot of overlapping buildings that were added in your changeset: 136183070 for this area. I'm curious if you are working on fixing them? Much appreciated!