Hi data 7,

Thank you for your feedback. It is to my understanding is that cycleway crossings (the nodes and ways) should only receive the crossing=traffic_signals tag (crossing=*) when there are dedicated signals explicitly marked for bicycles like the ones in this article https://nacto.org/publication/urban-bikeway-design-guide/bicycle-signals/bicycle-signal-heads/. This is why I used crossing=marked. However, I respect your opinion and will leave this matter as it is.

Hello aceman444,

Thank you for reaching out to me about this issue. I apologize for the error I have made and will be more mindful in the future. Thank you for making the edit on the feature. I appreciate you reaching out to me about this, and if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns please feel free to reach out to me. Thank you!

Hi Udarian,

Thanks for the feedback! I apologize for the confusion. You're right that crossing:signals=no is implied on crossing=uncontrolled and shouldn't be added explicitly. I'll make sure to keep this in mind and avoid adding unnecessary tags in the future. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Regards,
Reza

Dear eggie

Thanks for your comments and fixing the area.

Hi Besgeo, Thanks for the response, We will suspend our mapping of that structure to allow the completion of your project.

“Hi Besgeo, thank you for reaching out. My edit was to remove duplicate tags that got flagged in JOSM validations. if you have any other suggestions for fixing this, I'll be happy to attempt. Thank you”

Thank you for your comment and making the fix. I will keep a better eye on these cases next time. I have also fixed way/1232797450 via this changeset changeset/145854821.

Thank you,
VLD302

Hello ハチロク

Thank you for your feedback and for reverting the changes. My apologies for the incorrect modification. Please feel free to reach out again if you have any comments, questions, or other concerns. Have a great day!

Sincerely,
Reza

Hello SomeoneElse,

I have gone through my edits and I don't seem to see any that are similar to this one. Thanks again for reaching out!

Hello SomeoneElse,

Thank you for reaching out about this feature. I've gone ahead and reverted the changes back to the previous version. My apologies for incorrectly tagging the feature. Thank you again for reaching out, please feel free to reach out again if you have any comments, questions, or other concerns. Have a great day!

Hello SomeoneElse,

Thank you for reaching out to me about this issue. I have gone ahead and made a geometry edit on the building feature to be more aligned with the imagery. I apologize for overlooking this and thank you again for bringing this to my attention. If you have anymore questions, comments, or concerns, please feel free to reach out to me! Thank you!

Hello 4004,

Thank you for reaching out. I apologize for removing the street relation, after reviewing the situation again I've gone ahead and reverted the changes I made. Thank you for reaching out about this edit. If you have any more questions or comments please feel free to reach out! Thank you so much and have a great day!

Hello RSalenga, I saw that you added 66 connivence stores and gave them all the name "X" in the name tag. I was just wondering if all of these were named X? Thank you for your time and I hope you have a great day!

Hello 快乐的老鼠宝宝,

Thank you for reaching out to me about the tagging scheme regarding the shelter types on the bus station. I've added the shelter_type=public_transport to the nodes you linked to me. Thank you again for informing me of the tagging scheme, and I apologize for any confusion. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any more questions, comments, or concerns. Thank you and have a great day!

Sorry about the mistake, it has been fixed and thank you for the feedback

Hello
emersonveenstra, thank you for reaching out to me and taking the time to provide context to the feature. I apologize for my error and I will be restoring the name to the feature. Thank you again, and please feel free to reach out if you have any more questions or concerns."

Hello kylenz, thank you for reaching out to me about this feature. After looking over your links that you provided, I agree with your assessment of the naming of the feature and the area. Thank you for looking into this. I appreciate that you took the time to reach out, and please feel free to reach out again if you have any further questions or concerns.

This road is not a trunk road, it's just a residential road. Is it possible to fix it?