Hello nullroute,

I apologize for my mistake and have readjusted the footways to align with the newer mapbox imagery. Thank you for letting me know!

VLD298 / Lauren

Hi Lumikeiju,
That was an accident on my part. Thanks for letting me know!
Lauren

Hi Antoine,
Thanks for catching this and letting me know.
Happy mapping!
Lauren

Hi YomanNH,

Could you please clarify this a bit more for me? I reviewed my changeset and there do not seem to be any duplicated tags. I only added missing information to the crossing ways and nodes. If you can help me understand what was duplicated in the tagging, I would appreciate it. Thanks!

-VLD298 / Lauren

Hello Udarian,

Thank you, I will keep this in mind for future edits.

Happy mapping to you as well,

VLD298

Hello rskedgell,

The "foot=no" tag was added to maintain consistency with the adjacent cycleway sections, which already had this tag. I see that you have made a few tag adjustments already, but if you would also like to remove the foot=no tag for better accuracy, please feel free to do so.

Thanks, VLD298

Hi rskedgell,

I have updated the crossing:markings tag as you suggested. Thank you for the feedback.

-VLD298

Hello NeisBot,

Yes, the deletions here were intentional. The building polygons were removed because they were not accurately representing the true status of the area.

Thanks! -VLD298