Hi Minh Nguyen,
For this edit, my intention was to ensure that the crossing tag values are consistent between the node and way representing the same crossing. Unfortunately I did not have access ground imagery sources to verify the presence of traffic signals, so I chose to use the crossing=marked value from the way way/1118165359 since the markings are visible in aerial imagery. I apologize if this caused issues. You are welcome to make adjustments, or if you can provide an imagery source where those signals are visible, I can make an update.
Thanks, VLD288

Hi rskedgell ,

I missed the disused tag and added highway=cycleway because I was touching up crossing ways and saw the cycleway=crossing tag with the highway tag missing. I will be more attentive to disused tags in the future. Apologies for the mistake.

Best regards,
Weston

Hello jocek10,
I noticed that you mapped a walking bridge, way/1319037430. The feature you added does not appear in any imagery. I was wondering if you could confirm if such a bridge or park is correct here.
Thanks, VLD288