Hello aharvey,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I value my accuracy to the highest standards and I appreciate that you fixed the issue, and it will not happen again.

Best regards,

- David

Hi JesseFTW,

Thank you for your feedback! I will make sure to be more vigilant for typos in the future and avoid removing tags that should not be removed. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.

Best regards,
David

Hello @ Spaghetti Monster🍝 ,

Initially, there were overlapping highway issues with Floyd Line St (way/15897066) and adding a service road tagged as a cartpath (way/1025364251) we thought was the best option for this road feature. What we did was, conflated the two tags together, and deleted way/1025364251. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.

Hello @TheSwavu,

I will no longer make edits to either of these relations moving forward (relation/16308779 and relation/16308787). When I initially ran a validator for these relations in JOSM. I received over 20 warnings for ’Self-Intersecting Polygon rings.’ The relations broke as I was fixing this warning message, which posed a greater challenge since there are multiple relations overlapping. Thanks for this feedback and reverting the issue.

Hello user_5359,

Thanks for pointing these other features out to me as well. I appreciate that you fixed the tagging error I made, I will be more mindful in the future. Thank you again, and please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any other comments, questions, or concerns!

Hello user_5359, thank you for reaching out to me! I apologize for the confusion on the "yes=no" tag. It was an accident on my end. I've gone ahead and removed the tag from the feature. Thank you for reaching out again, and please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns! I went ahead and removed the tag, per changeset/143755187

Hello MxxCon, thank you for reaching out to me about the tagging issue of the crosswalks. I've gone back and corrected the tagging for the crosswalks with traffic signals. I appreciate you reaching out about this, thank you again and please feel free to reach out if you have anymore comments, questions, or concerns. Thank you!

Hello Landfahrer,
Thank you for your feedback. I will go ahead and assist you with this relation. Let me know if you may have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135434996

Hello Landfahrer,

It has come to my attention that relation/13999702 is currently an open loop relation. I see that this is a very large scale relation and want to get some context on if you will be continuing to close the open loops to this relation. Also, if there is any information on the best way to edit this feature that would greatly help.

Hello @Yu-Yang, I noticed that relation/14919913 has been broken because an open loop way (way/1120006742) has been added.

I fixed the relation by removing the way; therefore, the relation that represents the stream '舊旱溪' will render in OSM. Please let me know if there are any issues. Thank you.

Hi user @ruugie,

I went ahead and adjusted the geometry of the lake, per changeset/126749941. Please note that I did not create the lake nor the surrounding lakes in the nearby area.

Hello user @P-E_LRX,
It has come to my attention that your most recent Changeset# 125874810 has broken the relation# 3638339. The provided comment writes that you deleted the “old moremi game reserve boundaries, [because] the new are already here!” I searched online but I am having difficulty finding an updated boundary map that is less than five years old. Could you please provide supporting evidence to show the new boundary lines of the Moremi Game Reserve?

I also found relation# 13979637 which shows a closed loop for the Moremi reserve boundary lines.If you can please provide supporting evidence by the end of the day Friday, otherwise I will have to revert your relation and refer to relation/13979637 for the up-to-date boundary lines.

Best regards,
David

Hi Leo Slager,

Thank you, and thanks for taking a look at the relation. Can you give some context on why you changed the relation type from type=multipolygon into type=building?"

Hello @Sam888,

Recently your changes have broken a relation, such as relation #14426779. It is not a closed loop of segments as it should be, If you could please provide an explanation so that we may better understand each others’ thought processes. If an explanation is not provided, I will have to revert the changeset/124498244.

Hi @Sam888,

I noticed that your recent changes may have broken relation # 14377531. I want to get some more clarification on these edits to get a better understanding of the features that you added. I noticed that the edits did not create a closed loop, thus breaking the relation.

Best regards,
- David Todorut

Hi Guido,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I went ahead and removed the way(1065727972) that I previously added from changeset/121786595. The newest changeset is 122080732.

Please notify me if the problem persists, and I will further review the issue.

Best regards,
David

Hi Daniel,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. After further investigation it appears there is currently no intersection between covert Avenue and the railways, thus I removed the level crossings and added a tunnel for that segment of Covert Ave.