Hello Reeniz,

I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to inquire about the name tag edit for a building feature. Specifically, I am referring to the "name=addr:housename" tag for way/160523347. I was wondering if this is the appropriate name for this particular feature.

After some research, I noticed that the original "name=Block 6" seems to align more closely with how other nearby features are tagged. Therefore, I wanted to seek your expert opinion on this matter.

Thank you for your time and assistance. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,
Brian

Hello MxxCon,

Thank you for your comments on changesets 151471667 and 151471327. I have gone back and changed them in a way that should correspond to what you mentioned as needing attention. I am glad you reached out and am happy to listen to any other feedback you are willing to give.

Sincerely,

VLD168

Hello,
Thanks for pointing out the issue and providing some feedback with my edits on changeset #150984805. I will take your comments into consideration when making edits in the future.

Thanks, and feel free to reach out with any questions.

VLD168

Hi Enock4seth,

Thank you for reaching out. The reason for removing the names is that they were tagged as family homes, with the family names included, and were removed based on the OSM privacy standards found on this page osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information, which states not to map where individual people live and not to add the names of the inhabitants to dwellings. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to reach out.

Hi. We've fixed the issue mentioned in your comment. Thanks for your help.

Thank you for bringing these to my attention. I have changed the tags to reflect the correct state of addr:state=CA. I appreciate your help.

Thanks again!