Hello MXXCon,

We do not use either of those tools. We currently only use our internal tools for our QA process to catch these.

Best regards,
Anthony

Hello MXXCon,

Thank you for taking a look at the changeset. Before uploading the edits I ran the JOSM validator to see if there were any errors or warnings. I didn’t encounter any issues on my end. May I ask what the JOSM Validator warning said on your end?

Best regards,
Anthony

Hello YW23.

I saw that you had recently digitized some footways in this area. I checked all available imagery sets within OSM and I was unable to see anything that matched the features you had digitized. It may be worthwhile to review the Good Practice Wiki: osm.wiki/Good_practice

Have a great day,
Anthony
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127425595

Hello Md Shahriar Abdullah,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM. I saw that you had applied several layer tags to building areas and road geometry. The best way to resolve these over lap issues between the building areas and road geometry would be to reshape and reposition those features to match imagery. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Anthony S.

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. Based on the imagery source that you used, Bing aerial imagery, the playground feature that you edited (way/819508864),doesn’t exist in imagery. Do you happen to have local knowledge for this area?

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. Based on the imagery source that you used, Bing aerial imagery, the pitch feature that you edited (way/817985814) doesn’t exist in imagery. Do you happen to have local knowledge for this area?

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. I saw a road that intersects your water polygon, way/862363088, on the Western portion of the feature, and it also doesn’t match with Bing aerial imagery. When you compiled your GPX data, was this area under water?

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. I noticed that a highway=path tag was used in your edit. For example, way/755947390 located at 33.633684816586, 46.40767603196235. Based on what I saw in the available imagery sets, this should be a continuation of the highway=secondary road network (Way: 759529999 located at 33.632752672700946, 46.40808562249748) from the area South of your edit. The road network should also connect to the greater road network that is North of your edit at coordinates.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony

Hello Такси24,

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. I wanted to ask you about your edits in this area because I noticed that you had used the layer=-1 tag on most of these buildings. The building geometries don’t align with any of the available imagery sets as well. Please try to fix these edits or let me know if you need any help.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony

Hello, jwbrett,

Thank you for taking the time to read my message. I have made some edits in this intersection based on Bing aerial imagery. Here is the changeset: changeset/99186793#map=19/37.80864/-122.26312

Feel free to check it out!

Please enjoy the rest of your day,
Anthony

Hello wbrett,

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM 🙂 I wanted to ask you about way/713518759 as there seems to be several dragged nodes in this intersection. As much as I'd like to edit this area, I wanted to check in with you first as you may have a better understanding of this area.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony

Hello SL_Mapper,

Thank you for reading my message, and I hope you had a happy New Year’s celebration. I will make edits to the best of my ability without creating any errors.

Have a great rest of your day,
Anthony

Hello SL_Mapper,

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. I wanted to ask if you had any further updates for a reservoir feature that you had digitized two years ago because the feature currently overlaps several roads at

8.726293263990684, 80.9006034009139;
8.691771976522801, 80.89020044088898;
8.717798482318301, 80.87126328044587;
8.744422054977719, 80.86985122797978

Hope to hear from you soon,
Anthony

Hi Andrea,

Thank you for flagging this and explaining the issue. I will keep this in mind for my future edits.

Best regards,
Anthony

Hi Kovoschiz,

Here is the link for the reverted changeset: changeset/90316306

Thanks,
Anthony

Hello Kovoschiz,

Thank you for letting me know about this 🙂 I will go ahead and revert my changes.

Regards,
Anthony