OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
150239627 about 1 year ago

Hello afgb1977,

Thank you for reaching out! After further investigation I've gone ahead and removed the alt_name=Corona Island tag from the feature (changeset/160547296). I apologize for any confusion or inaccuracies from the alt_name tag being added onto the feature. Thank you again for reaching out to us, and if you have anymore questions, comments, or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you!

152810510 about 1 year ago

Hello cnvery,

Thanks for getting back to us! After further investigation it looks like another user removed the name "Illegal House" from the feature.

155934469 about 1 year ago

Hello Iqra Naaz,

I was wondering what your source was for this feature? It seems like it may have been copied over from Google, which is typically not acceptable for mapping per source=Google

156235980 about 1 year ago

Hello Sawera21,
I was wondering what source you used for this feature? It looks like it may be copied from Google, which is not an acceptable way to map as per source=Google

157302662 about 1 year ago

Hello manalnaseem123,

I was wondering where you sourced this information for this feature? It looks like it may be copied from Google and typically this is not an acceptable way to map as per source=Google

156768658 about 1 year ago

Hello amna0077,

I was wondering how you sourced the information for "BADRI GLASS AND INTERIOR WORKS"? It looks like it may have been copied from Google and typically this is not an acceptable way to map as per source=Google

156102708 about 1 year ago

Hello Iqra Naaz, this seems to be a feature that was copied directly from Google. Typically this practice of copying from Google is not an acceptable way to map, as per source=Google .

157374148 about 1 year ago

Hello again Areesha123, I noticed the sourcing from this seems to be copied from Google. Typically this is not acceptable per source=Google

157374148 about 1 year ago

Hello Areesha123, i was wondering where this information for this feature was acquired from? Thank you!

147126500 over 1 year ago

Hi Palgrave Peter,

Thanks for having a look at this. I appreciate the changes you've made to this location! Thank you!

147126500 over 1 year ago

Hello Palgrave Peter,

I was just curious about one of the features you've edited. For way/846681384 is this meant to extend all the way into the road way at this location? Or could it better be pushed back to follow the sidewalk instead? Thank you so much!

143028094 about 2 years ago

We do have the PNOA/ICGC layers available on RapiD, I apologize for my mishandling of editing without clearer imagery in the PNOA and ICGC. I will be more mindful when editing in Spain to make better judgments with these imageries. I will go ahead and fix the issue on the feature. I appreciate you taking the time to reach out to me about this and if you have any more comments, questions, or concerns please feel free to reach out. Thank you so much!

143028094 about 2 years ago

Hello aTarom, thank you for reaching out to me! I made a mistake in marking "crossing:markings"="yes", I meant to put "no". I also based my decision off the aerial imagery I was viewing as I could not find any markings at this location. I can go ahead and fix my edit and I apologize for the error, but do you recommend keeping it as "marked" as it was previously? Thank you!

123732808 over 3 years ago

Hello TheConductor!

I was just curious, wouldn't place=town be more in line with the the Clark County description of Enterprise? They consider this as an unincorporated town. I just wanted to understand why this would be considered place=city instead of place=town. Thank you and feel free to reach out to me, I hope you have a great day!
https://www.clarkcountynv.gov/government/departments/comprehensive_planning_department/divisions/advanced_planning_division/enterprise.php

122526056 over 3 years ago

Hello artem95vlasovets! I was just curious, why was the admin level changed from 8 to 2? Based on the wiki page for admin tagging, under the Brazil section, would admin_level=4 be more reasonable? I just would like to understand the change being made. Thank you for your time! boundary=administrative#admin_level.3D.2A_Country_specific_values

118255348 almost 4 years ago

Hello fabiotofy, thanks for reaching out and for the heads up on using the alt_name tag instead. The mapper has been informed and will remember to use the correct tag in the future. If you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to us!

113874777 about 4 years ago

Hello Dank - Jay, thank you for bringing this to our attention. I apologize for the mistake and have informed the mapper to better understand these specific scenarios when it comes to the language tag. Thank you again for reaching out about this situation and if there is anything else we can help with or discuss please feel free to reach out.

109274356 over 4 years ago

Hello, I apologize for the mix-up in the name change for the feature. The mapper was using an outdated source which led to the mistake. I have synced with them and went over how to avoid this in the future. Thanks for letting us know about the issue and feel free to reach out if you encounter any other issues from our team.

83839875 over 5 years ago

Hi mapman44,

Thanks for the feedback 🙂 I have reverted my changes to match Mapbox Satellite imagery. changeset/83893251

Thank you,
Michael