Hi opencarpatia,
According to the source you apply (local knowledge), I would say that you have to be right. That's why I have removed the existing culverts from the changeset.
Thanks for helping improve the OSM.

Hi ququruzka,
Thank you for the advice, is highly appreciated.

Hi opencarpatia,
Thank you for sharing the above information with us. I understand your position and I totally agree with it.
Best of luck!

Hello opencarpatia,
Thank you for the attention you pay to our commits.
I do apologies if unintentionally this bridge was marked as a culvert. Probably, the image was not very comprehensible.

Please inform us what other accurate sources are you using for editing, so we keep in mind in order to prevent future disagreements.

Hello opencarpatia,
Usually if in the image is visible and clear then it receives a tag (in the given example ,,ford,,), otherwise we don't touch it.
Please be informed that for editing and completing different tasks, we use Maxar Premium Imagery layer, which is the most accurate to actual ground data.
Thank you!

Hi Dyoma,
Thank you for letting us know about this issue. The information provided makes this case clear and obvious.
We do apologize for all the inconveniences created. We are all human and we all learn to become more knowledgeable in improving OSM.
Thank you again for your understanding.

Hi olehz,
Please inform us what other sources besides GPS-tracks are you using, so we keep in mind in order to prevent future disagreements.

Hello mavl,
Thank for your remark and your suggestion.
The path was moved because of the differences in the images. The primary source we use is Maxar Premium Imagery, because this tends to be the most accurate to actual ground data.

Hi Владимир К,
Thank you for your remark.
According to the name of the highway ,,Автозимник Верхнеколымск - Нелемное'' this definitely should be an ice road.

Hi dval,
Thank you for informing us about this issue. We highly appreciate your effort of taking time in explaining and sending us the useful information.
We understood where we have to pay attention and how to deal with such situations further.

Hi dval,
Thank you for informing us about this issue. We highly appreciate your effort of taking time in explaining and sending us the useful information.
We understood where we have to pay attention and how to deal with such situations further.

Hi dval,
Thank you for informing us about this issue. We highly appreciate your effort of taking time in explaining and sending us the useful information.
We understood where we have to pay attention and how to deal with such situations further.

Hi parukhin,
It was created a multi-polygon, therefore the tags were changed. Also, the restaurant was connected to another multi-polygon which is water.
Should you have more questions, please contact us.

Thank you very much for this suggestion. It is really a good idea.

Hi Tom Chups,
Please accept our apologies for the circumstances created.
Because we realign a lot, we correct many topology and data integrity errors, mistakes could happen.
Thank you for your understanding.

Hi skfd,
The system was showing an error exactly for this building. In the tag details it was mentioned as building, if it was tagged as floating building, the changes would not have been made.

Hi,
Thank you for your feedback. The information provided above, will help us to avoid the same situations in the future.

Hi Stalker61,
There was a misunderstanding between ice_road and ice_crossing. Thank you for noticing this issue.

@olehz,
Undoubtedly you are an experienced editor, that's why I want to thank you for the attention you pay to our commits.
Please inform us what other sources besides GPS-tracks are you using, so we keep in mind in order to prevent future disagreements.

@olehz,
I do apologies if unintentionally the GPS- tracks have omitted in this edit.
We also use GPS-tracks a lot, being an essential and an accurate source of editing.
Thank you for your understanding.