OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
180842202

I gathered info from combining what's provided on a map on amts.ct.it, a different one on ctgo.it, and a brochure and compared it with what was already on OSM marked as Amigo and on Google Street Map. I admit that even on the official sources there were various discrepancies.
I realize I should have not deleted some of them :)

180832835

of course the same applies to this one

180842202

hi, according to first party sources, the ones that I have deleted are mostly planned to be activated in the future, so I supposed that there was nothing at the moment, I agree that if there are actual docking stations at the moment those should be mapped, preferably with the new CTGO name tag, and as disused.
I'm not able to revert a deleted node, so could you do it or should I just add new nodes (which I know is not ideal)

158669979

I say that because the new mall indicates its address as Via Zinirco, 1

158669979

Hi, I think the current name is actually Via Zinirco, while Enrico Mattei is the older one.

161894826

Yes, shelter is still physically there but the sign is no longer present, also a FCE employee said that nobody stops there anymore.

161488756

I agree with your choice, I was wrong.

161435139

From the wikipedia page:
"Tavola, in alcune parti, il nuovo tracciato, a doppio binario ed a scartamento ordinario, utilizzerĂ  lo stesso sedime di quello storico a scartamento ridotto[31]; il che significa che le due linee, per quella parte di tracciato, non potrebbero coesistere."

This old line is expected to never be used again, it is marked as "disused" and not "abandoned" simply because the rail is still present.

161435139

after searching for (somewhat) similar cases in osm, I found relation/10385844
it is too a disused railway now used as foot/bike path, on a larger scale than the one in Catania,
given that that one is simply shown as a railway, with no path, I think this segment could actually be removed

161435139

I had also thought about it, but regarding legislation is actually less clear than it seems

161435139

of course

161435139

People use this part of the old track as a shortcut

161435139

Hi Giovanni, the way that is I just traced is a path used by hundreds of people everyday. It runs alongside the railway (but realistically, also on the railway itself, since there are no more trains passing from there)