Hi Adam, could I ask why you've removed the one-way tag from "Salmon Parade" in Bridgwater? Have the local council change their mind again?

Thank you mtmail, that was my mistake which I have fixed.

Hi Adam-Eye, could I ask what made you think Wickes in Taunton had closed?

Thanks Robert, I see now what you mean, a previous edit marked Wickes as disused, which was inaccurate.

Hi Robert, what made you think Wicks in Taunton had closed?

way/475589411

I believe the Church Street shop in Reading (Caversham) has closed, and a larger one has opened on Richfield Avenue.

Hi John, just an FYI, properties 50 to 58 of Mattravers Way have the post code TA1 3GN (not TA1 3FR), as do 73 onwards.

What did you remove from this location, as this was never the site of the Staplegrove Inn - the pub was by the mini roundabout further to the East.

Hi John,

I think Egremont Road only goes up to No. 63, with 65, 67, 69, 71 and 73 being part of "Crispin Close - TA4 1FQ"

*FIXME

You've added opening dates as "July 2017" to some roads that have existed for many years prior to this, why was this?

Why have you added a Costa here deptho? Has a second one been built?

Hi Bryce,

Are PhillyCarShare still trading?

From an OSM perspective the 'brand' might not be required, I couldn't say for sure. The Wiki reads "brand:wikidata=* should be accompanied by the corresponding human-readable brand=* tag." but then follows with "while this is redundant from a data perspective ..".

I'm only coming from an NSI perspective, and without the 'brand' to go along with 'brand:wikidata' many of your edits may flag with the standard "this entry looks like a brand" and I believe there might be tools out there which pick up on these, which could (rightly or wrongly) create more warning reports.

Just curious why you're only adding the 'brand:wikidata' tag and not the 'brand' tag as well?

Are these automated edits?

From my perspective at the time there were no obvious signs that it was an officially shared cycle / footpath - no colouring, no signs, no notices, which leads me to believe that at this point in time, it's only a designated pedestrian footpath.

That might change over time, but as of today I'm confident it's only a footpath.

The cycleway isn't present as yet, but if it's built I expect it will be at least a year before it appears.

I'd done a very rough edit of the current path, your drawing skills might be more advanced than mine.

Hillside joins either side of Enterprise Way, but via a staggered crossroad.

Filmed today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_sicorm0N4

Enterprise Way has a path on its Western side, but this doesn't seem to be a shared cycle path.

The smaller roundabout to the North has a shared cycle path around it.

The pull request has been accepted, and will be live next week.

Could you double check this edit CjMalone, as the area is post code TA22 9, not TA24