Tinetto's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 183885828 | I really appreciate you bringing the situation to my attention. Thank you for your message. Upon further inspection of the available GPS traces, I have made the corrections accordingly. I’ll make sure to pay greater attention to detail to avoid similar misinterpretations. |
|
| 183885828 | Hi fortera_au, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. |
|
| 183261351 | Hi Baloo Uriza, Apologies for missing it. Please find the URL below: https://github.com/tomtom-international/open-data/discussions/195 |
|
| 183261351 | Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for your inquiry and your insights about the local practices within OTA. I applied the bollard tags based on TomTom’s street-level imagery which is available for OSM edits internally. You can see the image at the location here: Source Request - OSM Changeset: 183261351 · tomtom-international open-data · Discussion #195
|
|
| 183261351 | Hi Baloo Uriza, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. |
|
| 182597862 | Hi ScrawnyMeowth1, Thank you for the nudge. After reviewing the area and previous tagging, I have changed the tagging back. I will be more careful with my analysis for similar edits going forward. |
|
| 182597862 | Hi ScrawnyMeowth1, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. |
|
| 180386770 | Hi notmyproblem1, thank you for your feedback and suggestions. I initially assessed the classification based on satellite imagery, but point taken to consider available ground-level imagery as well. I have made the corrections and restored the previous road classification. |
|
| 180386770 | Hi notmyproblem1, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you |
|
| 179622014 | Hi rskedgell,
|
|
| 179332795 | Thank you, happy mapping. |
|
| 179337870 | Hi maro21 and Yunkers. Thank you for letting me know about the status of the project. It’s probably a misinterpretation of proposal and construction stages. Changeset reverted while we’ll inquire more about the map feedback we received. |
|
| 179337870 | Hi maro21, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. |
|
| 178484162 | Thank you very much hlfan, for pointing toward the basemap. I truly appreciate it and will keep in mind to refer to it in similar situations.
|
|
| 178484162 | Hi hlfan,
|
|
| 178182756 | Hi whb, Thank you for making the corrections, and for letting me know. I referred to the GPS traces of the past month in my edit. Looking only to the past week’s traces, I see that they are also aligned with the source you provided. I will be more aware to better capture these temporal changes in my future edits. |
|
| 177014257 | Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝
|
|
| 177014257 | Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝 I made the edit based on internal feedback, but seems like I missed deleting way/15126522. I have made the corrections, and it should all be in order now. Thank you for your message. Please let me know if it is OK and you have any further concerns regarding my changeset. |
|
| 177047467 | Hi Leo Slager, During my edit, I missed to see the yield sign before the junction in recent Mapillary imagery. Thank you for making the corrections. I appreciate the feedback and will exercise greater caution in my edits. |
|
| 177017876 | Hi Baloo Uriza, I don’t have access to any up-to-date imagery. I made the edit based on user feedback, which was supported by TomTom’s recent GPS traces. |