TheNightRider's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 191264101 | Forgot to mention shortening the service road to the entrance until we get aerial imagery of the new road layout. |
|
| 187715365 | Aha! The 2-stall Flo charger got removed to make way for the Resound Energy Supercharger. Check Mapillary, which shows them installing the SfB. |
|
| 187715365 | Hey, for node/14097918416 this turned out to be a Supercharger for Business, not Flo. AFDC had the correct info, and it also had a Flo in the vicinity. Not sure where that is. |
|
| 190434879 | Sorry, it was the phone, not the hours, that was updated. |
|
| 190429642 | Accidentally used comments from changeset/190429647 . For this location changed the bank name, added old_name and address, and set to office because it's not a retail bank location. |
|
| 190118451 | Forgot to put comments for Tesla Supercharger: update branding per NSI changes. |
|
| 182902689 | Depending on what type of logistics center, this landuse area might need to be split into separate industrial and commercial areas. |
|
| 189952205 | Forgot to list this source: https://www.ent.com/our-locations/denver-region/lakewood-service-center/ |
|
| 189428778 | Just sent you a JOSM screenshot on Slack |
|
| 189428778 | I restored parking:fee:conditional, and it's interesting that iD's validator likes it. JOSM's validator was the one that complained. Explanation? |
|
| 189428778 | Hi, yes, the validator flagged parking:fee:conditional, so I looked it up and didn't see it, so changed it to fee:conditional. Looking at it with fresh eyes, that now seems wrong because fee:conditional would apply to the charging fee, not the parking fee, so looks like the validator is wrong. What do you think? |
|
| 189406894 | So all the SfB brands will need to be set up in the NSI. They are coming out of the woodwork, too. I've got a running list. |
|
| 189406894 | Just reverted the branding tags on this because iD is still prompting to tag it as brand=Tesla and brand:wikidata=Q478214 despite the Francis energy brand & brand:wikidata tags being in there and me telling folks to igore iD's prompts. :) That didn't work, and people will follow iD. |
|
| 189406894 | Yes, let's do a brainstorming session on the Tesla wiki. I somehow got off on a super-night owl schedule, so I'm trying to crash a little bit earlier every day. I've also done the NASA wraparound, when you stay up 1 hour later each day or two until you get in sync with the other guys on the Space Station. Talk later! |
|
| 189406894 | Francis Energy has single-handedly doubled the number of Supercharger stations in OK. Very impressive and people are using them, too. All have MagicDocks, so NACS and CCS1 plugs. |
|
| 189406894 | BTW, "Francis Energy". Their HQ are in Tulsa, OK, and they've been SUPER bad. ArtiePenguin on X and the TMC forum has been complaining about them for years. He drives a Kia EV6 and he's loving a lot more with the Tesla MagicDock.
|
|
| 189406894 | I've got 168 host=* tags I'm powering through to make them charging_station:host=* It's a bit easier for me to do 1 (or 2) tag changes at time. :) Almost crash time now. |
|
| 189406894 | Absolutely! brand=Francis Energy and operator=Tesla. This is the key to making sense of SfB. I've already been doing it, but now with the updated NSI, some refactoring is in order, including dumping the not:brand, network:*, and updating the brand:wikidata. |
|
| 189119388 | There's no one more focused on the positional accuracy of EV charging stations than me, and I think GA_Kevin did the perfect thing here with the fixme and references to charge point operator Red E's own website. It's unfortunate that Red E used GMaps as their map, but even City and County permitting agencies do it. Because Red E said they know where their own station is, I'm confident that it's in that parking lot. We'll soon get street-level or aerial imagery to precisely map it. I'd vote for leaving it as is until then because that parking lot is small, so any positional error will be small. |
|
| 189039333 | I have been wanting to get on Slack because I've been told that the "center of gravity" for OSM US is on Slack, so despite it being proprietary software, gotta go where people are. BTW, I got an invite to Slack, so I'll be on there soon. |