never mind, the change is correct

As the two notes on the areas themselves say, the water area is not visible in imagery released both before and after the the edit was made, what is going on here ? is the latest imagery still too old to view the areas ?

Last time I was here I didn't remember seeing any sign indicating a turn restriction (will look again when I next visit) . What source was used for this edit ?

As there are no lines of erosion or any physical indication of there having been a drain there, should the way be deleted ?

way/1092941900
this drain is not visible in aerials, is it underground ?
or is it outdated info ?

It was just surface level road work, seems to be done now, haven't noticed any digging.

Shouldn't these be tagged as proposed and not construction as construction has not yet begun

What I am asking is whether you used gmaps for making this edit. As copying gmaps data breaks copyright law if you did so the edit may have to be reverted.

If you instead made the edit based on what you have observed in real life the place may be kept

Since you added the restaurant in between the road and the building and not on the building itself it feels like the location data is copied from gmaps.

Is this the case ?

**Talking about the link in the note you left before adding this place

Was this mapped using google maps as a reference or was this mapped through in-person-observation and the link just to show that the place exists ?

Kindly note that the place may have to be deleted if there is no response

*any not and

Why in specific is this bench the "scary one", do you remember and specific details ?

Yes, Fixed the typo

It is a pain to tag like that in Everydoor. But as of recently I have started changing the tags manually. I have no I idea why it is like this, to me shop=yes seems more informative than an amenity=fixme. There are also tools for others on Street Complete or SCEE to expand on shop=yes

Anyways rant aside, I will now change the tag to interior decoration

I meant interior_decoration not design

Yes it is a shop, from its name it sounds like a wallpaper shop (It was added with mapillary imagery). Should I have tagged it as interior design ?

I don't recall what exactly, I think it might be plates made of leaf and other similar items.

I don't recall for sure though, give me a few days time I will recheck the area and get back

from what I am aware the residential area tag should go only towards areas primarily towards housing complexes and such

Is it really right to mark a village as a residential area ?

so... in cases where i am unsure on the type of road, should i just guess the best fit ?