my bad

Sorry for the delay. I'm not sure why I created that fix me. I might have just fumbled the controls in the app.

Thank you keepright, I'll present my case there, even if it might not lead to anything.

Hey Janete. Focusing on mapping based on Carto seems like a mistake to me. Carto is just one rendering solution. There's a reason we shouldn't map based on rendering.

What we should be focusing on is map functionality. Sure if it is mapped as a funicular it can be seen in iD but it cannot be used easily by consumers. Even without rendering iD provides navigation through them.

Perhaps we could combine the tags? highway=elevator and railway=funicular? It feels jury-rigged and definitely even more mapping for the renderer but it would preserve functionality and visibility.

Hello everyone, I only noticed this discussion now. Is it too late to give my input?

I’d like to start by apologizing to Janete for not answering their comment on my changeset. I don’t think these send a notification.

I changed this elevator and many others because of their functionality:

1. This elevator is more akin to a standard public elevator which serves small scale urban traversal than to a funicular which tends to be medium scale public transport. It is small, automatic, user controlled and doesn’t follow a schedule.

2. In terms of functionality, it being an inclined elevator is also more beneficial. Inclined elevators work as is by most navigation engines I tested while funiculars don’t work even when routes are created.
This proves to be a large detriment to a public elevator which can expected to be used casually for urban movement than it would be for public transport where it is expected to require some forethought.

3. As to the lack of rendering, that is a simple deficiency in Carto which can easily be corrected as opposed to changing the whole background functionality of the elevator.
OsmAnd for example renders inclined elevators.

In conclusion, besides being the technically correct designation, calling this transport an inclined elevator is both more correct in a practical sense and offers better functionality for navigation.
This elevator has more in common with the public elevators at the public park a little to the northwest than to the elevators at Montmartre which function more like large scale public transport and were kept as funiculars.

*Rua da Prata

Olá! Vi que mudaste o tipo da Rua Áurea para pedestre, mas em uma das vias passam elétricos e carros regularmente. Não seria o tipo residencial mais adequado?

Hey Mateusz.

The building tag was already part of the marketplace node when I edited it. I didn't want to remove tags I couldn't verify so I left the building tag as is.

I interpreted "A casa da Amélia" as being the name of the building, so I included this information as best I could while fixing the incorrect building tag.

I realize this format is breaking the one feature one element rule, but I didn't want to risk losing the information on the node when I can't verify the area physically.

What do you think I should do to fix the node?

I misclicked on the ask for review option sorry