Thank you for the information on the editing practices on this highway. I am aware of how headings need to be going in opposite directions on a trunk highway like this, but regardless I will be mindful of details on high priority roads like this one.

Hello muralito,
Thank you for your insight and I will defer with your edits. I made this one lane as the imagery I used (Vantor Hub 2025-11-05) shows no lane marking suggesting it is two lanes. Upon further review, I now understand this is just because of the construction.

Hello ilias_, this was an oversight on my part. I had forgotten that I’d already reviewed this area and somehow didn’t recognize it was the same feature we previously discussed. My sincere apologies for the confusion. I will change these back to access=private. Happy mapping!

Hello ilias_! Thank you for reaching out. I will go ahead and change access=permissive tagging here to access=private and apply the tagging to (way/1445318085) as well. Happy mapping!

Hello ilias_! Thanks for reaching out! I will go ahead and remove access=private tagging and change the barrier=gate to barrier=lift_gate. Happy mapping!

Hello Angoca, thank you for responding I will add this feature to the data have a nice day.

Hello Angoca! Investigating the area I agree with you that this does not appear to be a service road, thank you for removing it. Looking at Esri World imagery I do see a potential service road that starts in this area (node/5040208978) and ends just before the river here (node/11993185643). What do you think about adding a service road here? I look forward to your response.