Thank you for the information. I will refer to the telegram channel in the future for classification edits.

I see what you mean, and you’re probably right. I will keep this in mind going forward. Thanks!

Sorry about that, I do see that now. I will change this back right now.

I was viewing this portion of highway as a continuation of way/90453429 and the rest of the tertiary. Again, I can understand your want to tag it as a link. Thanks.

For way/496581037, I chose to model it as tertiary because I viewed it as the corresponding highway to way/655602587 and way/655602590. However, I understand why you would want to tag it as a link. Thank you.