SunnyIsland10's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173806333 | about 2 months ago | Thank you for clarifying that! Would you be willing to update the classification on the remaining segments of the road that were left as trunk (way/1380065450, way/1380065449, way/1443644657, way/1316351013, and 1445245692) for consistency? Thanks! |
| 173806333 | about 2 months ago | Greetings mapperaid, I noticed that the Ozgon Bypass Road (Karool – Ana-Kyzyl) was recently upgraded to a motorway. Typically, the motorway classification is reserved for roads that are part of a broader motorway network. Since there are currently no other motorways in Kyrgyzstan, this segment appears to function more as a major regional connector than as part of a national motorway system. Classifying this road as trunk would offer better continuity within the existing trunk network and also align the classification with similar high-quality roads in the region. Based on this, would you be open to reclassifying this road to trunk? Looking forward to your thoughts here. |
| 173721542 | 2 months ago | Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-10-19 |
| 172085008 | 3 months ago | Hello Dimitar155, This editor is no longer on the team but thank you for changing this back. The modeling looks good to me. Have a great day! |
| 172132549 | 3 months ago | Hello foreigner037, This editor is no longer on the team but thank you for changing this back. I agree with your modeling here. Have a good day! |
| 171204721 | 4 months ago | Greetings Dimitar155, Thank you for sharing that resource and for updating the construction. Have a great day! SunnyIsland10 |
| 170792862 | 4 months ago | Greetings rhhs, I will review my previous edits to check for signage. Thanks!
|
| 170792862 | 4 months ago | Greetings Dimitar155 and rhhs, Thank you both for the information and resources regarding the laws and pedestrian traffic signs in Bulgaria. I will now only apply foot=no tags when prohibited road signs are present. Have a great day,
|
| 170792862 | 5 months ago | Greetings rhhs, I am attempting to create a safer pedestrian network across Bulgaria by applying foot=no tags where I notice segments are considered unsafe for pedestrian passage. I am attempting to follow similar logic used when adding in foot=no tags similar to this bridge (way/20098815). What do you think about continuing to add foot=no to instances where we do not see any pedestrian friendly segments of road? As for the changes related to sidewalks, I am using more specific tagging (sidewalk:right=*) when the sidewalk is visible in ground level imagery, as the sidewalk=separate page mentions (sidewalk=separate) Thank you for your reaching out,
|
| 168664043 | 6 months ago | Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2022-06-29 |
| 112735532 | 6 months ago | Greetings Savo25656 Thank you so much for responding to our messages and sharing this information. Have a great day,
|
| 112735532 | 6 months ago | Greetings Savo25656, Thank you for the clarification and for sharing these helpful resources. I wanted to ensure you are aware of this more recent document from October 31, 2019, which outlines the decision on the classification of public roads (https://web.archive.org/web/20240716215656/https://vladars.rs/sr-SP-Cyrl/Vlada/Ministarstva/msv/Documents/%D0%9E%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%2520%D0%BE%2520%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9A%D1%83%2520%D1%98%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85%2520%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0_406181601.pdf). Is this the version you’ve been referencing to update Refs along the roads in Bosnia and Herzegovina? If you have any other relevant information related to this, I’d be grateful if you could share. Were you able to confirm these ref changes from ground level imagery or from driving around and seeing the signs personally? Thanks again for your help!
|
| 115398900 | 7 months ago | Greetings eclipse28 I noticed an addition of a Ref along a primary road for example: M-I 115, formerly M-19 seen in this changeset: changeset/115398900#map=12/44.0075/18.8766 Have you been able to verify these road signs in person, or have you found any evidence of these road signs online? Have a great day,
|
| 144658497 | 7 months ago | Greetings TheMiner I noticed several highway ref changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For example, R459a being updated to R-I 4104 in this changeset: changeset/144658497#map=11/44.7769/19.1054 Have you been able to verify these road signs in person, or have you found any evidence of these road signs online? Have a great day,
|
| 112735532 | 7 months ago | Greetings Savo25656 I noticed several highway ref changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For example, M5 being updated to M-I 114 in this changeset: changeset/112735532#map=11/43.8283/18.7385 Have you been able to verify these road signs in person, or have you found any evidence of these road signs online? Have a great day,
|
| 104517771 | 7 months ago | Greetings stefo_bl I noticed several highway ref changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For example, M16 being updated to M-I 101 in this changeset: changeset/104517771#map=11/44.5476/17.1997 Have you been able to verify these road signs in person, or have you found any evidence of these road signs online? Have a great day,
|
| 166888058 | 7 months ago | Greetings, Thank you for the insight and for sharing. Our team will look for on-the ground truths. Have a great day!
|
| 166888058 | 7 months ago | Hi! Thank you for sharing these resources! I did notice that the formatting/syntax changed a little bit from the document. The pdf shows the ref as "RII-5511", but in OSM the ref is formatted as "R-II 5511”. Do you know if this was intentional, or is there any chance you have been able to confirm how these are signed on the ground? Thank you,
|
| 166888058 | 7 months ago | Greetings Badojo, Thank you for your mapping in Bosnia and Herzegovina! I recently noticed new highway ref tags, such as ref=R-II 5511 and old_ref=R-457, that were added in this changeset: changeset/166888058 Do you have any resources that confirm these new ref numbers? Any additional information on these would be greatly appreciated. Thank you and have a great day! SunnyIsland10 |
| 163904841 | 9 months ago | Greetings sAm6831Tta, I have noticed recent updates to road classifications in Yemen, particularly the widespread changes from Trunk to Primary, such as on M100 (way/204613864). These updates appear inconsistent with the current classification guidelines on the Yemen OSM wiki page (osm.wiki/Yemen), which states that roads like M100, M45, and M55 should be classified as Trunk roads. It’s possible that the wiki is outdated, and was wondering if you have any updated resources or documentation that you're referencing for these changes? If so, it would be greatly appreciated if you could update the wiki with this information. I appreciate your help and look forward to hearing from you!
|