Stretch Longfellow's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
102146255 | about 1 month ago | Can you be more specific as to where the concern is? This is a four year old edit and my memory isn't that good! I don't disagree with your statement in general, but I also can't verify this situation without knowing where you are referring to. |
162139462 | 2 months ago | Not surprised; Haymarket is a bit of a mess and I just need to go through and clean up a bunch of things. I'll take a crack at it sometime this week. |
161173551 | 4 months ago | Whoops; thanks! |
156285399 | 7 months ago | As much as I appreciate the Cornhusker Council history as an avid Scouter in the area, this is not how to edit this. This is not the name of the woodland, and historic names have a different tagging scheme. I recommend checking out OpenHistoricMaps for stuff like this. |
156649087 | 8 months ago | I appreciate the adding of the bike path. Everything I've encountered about it has indicated that it is officially an extension of Hollow Road; is there signage stating "South Bypass"? And should it be upgraded from tertiary? This was originally mapped as primary. |
154577811 | 8 months ago | Should be fixed now. Thanks! |
141787685 | 9 months ago | The proper way to tag business route is to write out "Business", not abbreviate to "Bus", as shown on osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#U.S._Highways. Please revert. |
153206398 | 10 months ago | Yep, read that on the wiki and then used destination out of habit. Thanks for catching that! I'll fix it now. |
148321131 | about 1 year ago | Why did you mark several roads as no access? |
147083283 | about 1 year ago | I think you may have misunderstood how the access=no tag works. It is overriding access on US 77 entirely, despite motor_vehicles=yes. |
148550947 | about 1 year ago | Is this bypass open already? I was under the impression that it hasn't opened yet, but I could be wrong. If it is, looks like there's a bit of cleanup to do with road priorities and ref tags on the old highway. |
136768812 | about 1 year ago | I'm using iD. There was no trunk route to the ramps previously, just a trunk_link. 4th Corso is now a trunk. I'm going to go ahead and clean this up. |
136768812 | about 1 year ago | Could you explain this edit, please? You seem to have added some trunk spurs, which does not mesh with OSM standards, and why was the link dropped? |
148014295 | about 1 year ago | I'm not entirely sure what you did here or what your goal was, but ya done gone broke things. (It happens.) Could you explain what you did so that we can try to fix it? Looks like you broke a few relations of multipolygons. |
145749476 | over 1 year ago | Thanks! |
137437359 | over 1 year ago | Also check expressway tags. |
137437359 | over 1 year ago | I'm not sure why this was included in your edits of Highway 12, but your edits on US 34/75 need some quality control. Some directions go the wrong way. Is this even open yet? |
85907195 | over 1 year ago | I am inclined for intermittent over deleting outright, and maybe changing the tag from lake to something more appropriate to its depth even when full. It does appear on state and federal maps, so it at least exists sometimes, and some of the aerial maps do appear soggy at least. This area also dramatically changes by season and drought (I see the unmapped canal is also dry in these images). I tried to see if there was any local street view photography, but no such luck out there (not surprised). |
141968208 | over 1 year ago | Fixed; thanks! |
141966104 | over 1 year ago | Fixed; thanks! (That's what I get for trying to separate lines and add more detail...) |