Well, this sent me down a rabbit hole, and I don't have an answer as a result. According to some state maps, this is actually and bizarrely correct. https://dot.nebraska.gov/media/v5mlid3d/cfuncdundysfc.pdf Dundy County GIS uses OSM, so that wasn't much help, and NGPC maps don't show this at all.

My inclination would be to extend Haiger Canal to the Arikaree River, as there are definitely parts that appear to be manmade (namely that really straight stretch), but I don't really have a way of confirming that.

Why did you eliminate service=driveway?

This did not open until today. Please do not rely on aerial imagery to remove construction as that may be severely outdated. Also, OSM has a policy against using imagery without a license.

It is not. Fixed. Thanks for catching; not sure how this slipped past me!

Can you be more specific as to where the concern is? This is a four year old edit and my memory isn't that good! I don't disagree with your statement in general, but I also can't verify this situation without knowing where you are referring to.

Not surprised; Haymarket is a bit of a mess and I just need to go through and clean up a bunch of things. I'll take a crack at it sometime this week.

Whoops; thanks!

As much as I appreciate the Cornhusker Council history as an avid Scouter in the area, this is not how to edit this. This is not the name of the woodland, and historic names have a different tagging scheme.

I recommend checking out OpenHistoricMaps for stuff like this.

I appreciate the adding of the bike path. Everything I've encountered about it has indicated that it is officially an extension of Hollow Road; is there signage stating "South Bypass"? And should it be upgraded from tertiary? This was originally mapped as primary.

Should be fixed now. Thanks!

The proper way to tag business route is to write out "Business", not abbreviate to "Bus", as shown on osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#U.S._Highways. Please revert.

Yep, read that on the wiki and then used destination out of habit. Thanks for catching that! I'll fix it now.

Why did you mark several roads as no access?

I think you may have misunderstood how the access=no tag works. It is overriding access on US 77 entirely, despite motor_vehicles=yes.

Is this bypass open already? I was under the impression that it hasn't opened yet, but I could be wrong.

If it is, looks like there's a bit of cleanup to do with road priorities and ref tags on the old highway.

I'm using iD. There was no trunk route to the ramps previously, just a trunk_link. 4th Corso is now a trunk. I'm going to go ahead and clean this up.

Could you explain this edit, please? You seem to have added some trunk spurs, which does not mesh with OSM standards, and why was the link dropped?

I'm not entirely sure what you did here or what your goal was, but ya done gone broke things. (It happens.)

Could you explain what you did so that we can try to fix it? Looks like you broke a few relations of multipolygons.

Thanks!

Also check expressway tags.