Thanks for this question and I understand what you are saying. The majority of garages actually have "fonzie flats" or studios above them facing these laneways. Part of my work with the local Council involves inspecting these and allocating separate addresses to the main house on the property. So I often check it out while riding through on my way to work. Hope that helps explain my reasoning. If you can suggest better tagging to make this clear, Im open to hearing it :)

Hi, do you know if this shared path is complete? If not, construction might be better until surveyed.
Btw, did you use Bing or ESRI imagery?

Hello, regarding the M5 Westbound Upgrade in this changeset, will you be adding the full extent, including exit east of Moorebank Ave and the underpass under Moorebank Ave?

Hi Heroly, regarding this changeset, I drove along Bernera Road today, but I could only see a shared path on the western side of the road. Have you seen some evidence of a shared path on the eastern side too?
If not, perhaps its just a footpath?
Regards,
Stephen

Hi there, thanks for editing OSM :)
Just wanted to remind you that adding roads to OSM that are only proposed on paper is generally discouraged.
If you are going to add a proposed road, it must be tagged correctly so it doesn't appear as a trafficable road (as this one currently is) and confuse navigation.
See highway=proposed for the correct usage of tags for proposed roads.
If you are unsure, let me know and I can correct it for you :)
Cheers,
Stephen

Hello,
I noticed you have updated the information for many schools in NSW. One of these is incorrect.
Passfield Park School was previously located on Guernsey Ave, Minto, but it has recently relocated to 39 Durham St Minto.
As a result there are now two schools named Passfield Park School in Minto. The one you added is actually on top of Sarah Redfern High and Sarah Redfern Public.
Is it possible to remove the one you added, so there is only one which is located at 39 Durham St Minto?
If unsure, please let me know.
Kind Regards,
Stephen

Hi Maradona11,
I have noticed that you have marked this path as being a shared path. However, the path is very narrow - 1 metre or less, has no Shared Path markings or signage, and goes through an area with lots of pedestrian movement. Can I ask how you determined that this path is a "Shared User Path"?
Thanks,
Stephen

Hi there,
I have ridden through there a number of times over the last 12 months, and there are indeed two boom gates to stop through traffic. I assume the only ones would could get through are deliveries for dock, cyclists, pedestrians and emergency vehicles, but i don't recall a sign saying that - it just says "No Entry - Authorised Vehicles Excepted" at either end.

Thanks for picking it up, I wasn't confident with it. How did you know about it?
I've replaced it here - changeset/128964775

I agree with you. Can't think for the life of me why i thought it was shared. Maybe wishful thinking! I will change it back soon. Thanks for letting me know :)

According to - https://www.hawkesbury.nsw.gov.au/emergency/flood-emergency/flood-project-updates - they are still designing the drain. So I'd say a number of months yet.

Thanks for your comment. I agree it cannot be both.
Perhaps the park should be split into two to show the northern part as leisure=park, and the southern part as natural=wood? What do you think?
In terms of the boundary of the park, it seems to be smaller according to GNB/SIX Maps. Shall I redraw it?

Hi Jimmy, thanks for the review :)
I have verified the extent of the section closed as I use it to commute from Bonnyrigg to Hurstville by bicycle.
As CBCity has not given any dates for re-construction, I wanted to ensure it was clearly symbolised to users of OpenStreetMap.
The construction tag seemed to make it clear it was not available.
What symbolisation does the "Access=No" tag appear as?
Cheers,
Stephen

Thanks, thats good to know.

Thanks for letting me know. I'll update it without merging.