OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
66064592

According to the land operator it seems that this road will be built/operated by DARS.

66064592

https://ipi.eprostor.gov.si/jv/ shows that land for the road was already bought (or nationalised?) so it will be built eventually.

150275429

thanks, updated in changeset/165166946

163902216

Improved in
changeset/164276946

163902216

Tag start_date ni namenjen temu, da bi vnaprej doočali omejitve, ampak kdaj je bilo kaj zgrajeno oz. odprto:
start%20date=*?uselang=sl

Kasnejši začetek veljavnosti enosmernosti bi se verjetno dalo izraziti z
osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions
oz. v tem primeru konkretno s tagom
"oneway:conditional"

Predlagam brisanje tu dodanih tagov tagov start_date.

159190362

Preimenoval nazaj na Jurčkovo cesto in vrisal novo ulico drevakov v gradnji

159190362

Glede na velikost gradbišča razvidnega na ortofotu in OPPN 391:
https://www.ljubljana.si/assets/Uploads/dop-osn-OPPN-391-Jurckova-zahod.pdf
se bo "Ulica drevakov" imenovala neka nova ulica vzhodno od te, ki si jo preimenoval.

143543107

Hvala za odgovor, me veseli da za brisanje ni bilo globjih razlogov!

Hkrati pa se veselim tudi vaših drugih prispevkov o zadevah (poti, koč, parkirišč, zapornic, omejitev na cestah....) s katerimi ste seznanjeni pred obiskovalci - uporabniki OSM in ljubiteljskimi kartografi.

143543107

Pozdravljeni TNP, veseli me da v OSM prispevate tudi vi!

Zanima me, zakaj se vam je zdelo smiselno odstraniti oznaki za
wikidata=Q1163005
in
wikipedia=sl:Triglavski narodni park

Ti dve oznaki sta namreč predstavljali povezavi na:
https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1163005?uselang=sl
https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/sl:Triglavski%20narodni%20park?uselang=sl

Več o teh oznakah si lahko preberete na:
wikidata=*?uselang=sl
in
wikipedia=*?uselang=sl

136099454

There might be similar problem near https://maproulette.org/challenge/39264/task/162489719 where a massive demolition and rebuilding is being done.

136099454

Well, it just happens, that in Ljubljana there is a newer version of orthophoto available, published by the city.
That one is also available in JOSM editor, but apparently not used detect missing building tasks for maproulette.

I have marked the task https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/39264 as not an issue with link to new orthophoto to hopefully prevent such mishaps in future.

136099454

Reverted in changeset/137232074

136099454

Please note, that most of these buildings were demolished and all orthophotos aren't up to date yet.
See one that is: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?basemapUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fgis06.ljubljana.si%2Farcgis%2Frest%2Fservices%2FPodloge%2FDOF_2022_D96%2FMapServer&source=sd

129139484

Added proposed=tertiary (same as Bratislavska cesta and Pot na Fužine) and source
https://www.ljubljana.si/assets/Uploads/Elaborat-lokacijske-preveritve2.pdf

133518889

Hej, zakaj poleg obstoječih cest rišeš vzporedne ceste za motorna vozila, npr way/1152865467

133473625

It seems this introduced gaps in many bus routes. Please see https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/SI/Ljubljana/SI-Ljubljana-LPP-Analysis.diff.html

130710562

Ah, sorry for the wrongful accusation on my part. It seems that they were broken before you touched them, fixing them partially as indicating in the changeset comment.

130710562

Hey, the admin relations are not closed anymore. Can you please fix that?
Thanks!

129140938

Iz višjega dela kristalne palače
way/305523064
sem odstranil building=commercial
ker je to le building:part (glej building:part=* ),
ki je vsebovan v celotni zgradbi way/143867459
ki že ima building=commercial

118605921

Merged the table to osm.wiki/Bus_routes_in_Ljubljana
so we don't have id duplicated anymore