*Svetozara Miletića

Your changes have been reverted changeset/180557988

Hi,

Mapping temporary infrastructure can often lead to "data rot" where the map becomes outdated the moment the project ends. Plus, if it’s just basic pipework, and it has nothing to do with trams (besides the fact that trams can't pass). Works will also be over in less than two months. https://www.bvk.rs/dodatno-produzenje-vremena-za-izvodjenje-radova-u-ruzveltovoj-ulici/

Why did you change living streets to residential streets and kept maxspeed tag? Did they remove the signs, or is it a mistake?

Da li je ovaj blok greška node/9805684702 ?

Also, you completely ignored sign for combined cycle- and footway (here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.253682389352&lng=19.841365636634&z=17&pKey=425667063493363&focus=photo&x=0.2795284038444516&y=0.5179497222696728&zoom=2.5581030229766246) which cannot be mapped separately because unlike regular cycleways, cyclists have to give way to pedestrians.

Also, amenity=waste_disposal is not correctly mapped on Yandex https://yandex.com/maps/-/CHWRiL3- I can see that waste-basket is on the pavement.
The way it's now mapped, it can only be assumed that basket is on some sort of median like grass, but that is not the case. Only way to map it correctly is to put position=sidewalk which is de facto in use osm.wiki/Proposal:Position_of_bicycle_parking_facilities_and_other_street_furniture

Regarding 1st point, here is a similar example from the Netherlands https://maps.app.goo.gl/NzsrgLbNqKBCxKPG7

Convention is that you place a pedestrian next to cycle crossing like this node/2090532531

Here highway=cycleway in "Examples".
4th example is the same case as paths in Jevrejska ulica (two paths segregated by a kerb)

This is wrong, if cycleway and footway are separated by one object we still map it as one please read highway=cycleway

*rupu

Koliko me je JOSM upozoravao mislio sam da će changeset pokriti pola Evrope

мотопут је државни пут намењен искључиво за саобраћај мотоцикала, путничких возила, теретних возила и аутобуса, са или без прикључних возила и као такав обележен прописаним саобраћајним знаком

It needs this sign https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Serbia#/media/File:Serbia_road_sign_III-21.svg

That sign does not prohibit pedestrians, ATVs or similar vehicles so it's not trunk road legaly speeking.

in changeset/165726989

Fixed

Is there a sign from trunk road? Because I can't see one on Mapillary.

I really did not know that contact lines do not work, from what I could see they looked finished. I just thought that our state-owned train operator runs diesels trains because they don't have electric ones.

I think that I just accidentally overwrote the old ETCS tag when I removed construction: part from railways.

Here is a video from a cab, in which you can see that the railway is electrified https://youtu.be/T0jE1b9A3HM

I was on that train and railway is very mush electrified otherwise it wouldn't work.

Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! Your edits help make the map more accurate and useful for everyone. Keep up the great work! 😊🌍