I believe that you've significantly misplaced way/963064447 (in fact, most of it it should not exist at all since it's basically mostly way/124121572 ). When NPE maps were created, there was a significant error added that matches your alignment. I lived there for many years and spent a lot of time making sure that what was mapped in OSM mapped reality (including former railways). You have undone much of that hard work.

Thanks for updating this - but just for info if you look at http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=2519639 and zoom in on Burntisland you'll see a little gap and an extra bit along the old route that hasn't been removed yet.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I'm guessing that there's actually a connection to the road at node/11655801931 (at least for foot traffic) as well? Or is there some sort of wall here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Just wondered if relation/10841834 should really be a "historic=tower" - I wonder if maybe something like "townland" was what was intended?

... based on my visits around that time not selling 98 octane was pretty unlikely too. Obviously it's now 2023, so different again.

3 of them (1029956922, 1029956923, 1029956924) also have a "peak=yes" tag. If this is really a "natural=peak", then adding a node where appropriate would also make sense.

What I can't see is how you'd easily cross east to west. Also, lots of other NCN52 is missing here.

It looks like way/1101338499 is an invalid duplicate of what is now a cycleway.

Hello - just checking - can shop=vacant be removed from https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/617266279 ?

Hello CESTU,
Please use meaningful changeset comments that explain what your are changing and what the source was.
Best Regards,
Andy

@અંકલેશ્વર does this need reverting?

Hello,
I think something's gone a bit wrong on the wikidata side of things: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q116774792&action=history . I've changed "promotory" to "promontory" in OSM, but wikidata still has it in the item description.
Cheers,
Andy

Hello and welcome to OSM!,
Please don't "label" routes like this. Many of the ways that make up the Pennine Way have other names; many are also part of other routes.
If the name of a route is in OSM, then maps that want to can use that, for example https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/53.36923/-1.82544
(there the route name is in purple the thing in brackets is the local footpath reference, and the duplicated Pennine Way name in black is the name added in this changeset).
Also see e.g. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=11.0/53.3745/-1.7819 .
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!

Hello,
I think that you might have accidentially added the quiet_lane designation to the wrong thing on way/539425190 . That's an admin boundary; presumably you meant to add to the road?
There's a list of ones to check at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rn8 , which includes a hedge and a fence.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Are these node/2178765359/history wells or water tanks? I'd have thought that they were fairly different structures.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
I'm not convinced that "designation" is ideal for way/781397657/history - it already has intermittent=yes; "designation" is normally used for legal designations.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Does designation make sense for e.g. way/727695757/history here? "designation" is normally used for a legal status; this is just a private track on a golf course.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
On way/723321902/history you've changed "designation=cart_path" to "designation=golf_cart_path". I can see the logic, but I don't think that either make sense - it's just a private track on a golf course.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What's the significance of "designation=The Co-operative Food" on e.g. way/219994751/history ? It now has brand, name, operator - and designation.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
What does "designation=H.41" mean on e.g. way/234173832 ?
Best Regards,
Andy