Hello,
I'm guessing that way/1571416828/history is some sort of footpath? It hasn't got any tags yet.
Best Regards,
Andy

Just for info - I split the crossing at way/1565622967/history in two and added halk of it to the Nene Way to fill in a gap https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=85093

I've added way/1561436762 to the local NCN1 and EV12 relations.

Hello,
I was just wondering how the footpath at node/14181382314 join the road? I spotted that a gap had opened up in the cycle route relation/116590#map=19/52.341181/-1.585096 - presumably there is a way for a pedestrian or a cyclist to get between the two marked parts of the cycleway there?

Best Regards,
Andy

Specifically, https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/10108

A caveat here of course is whether the 14.5 width is for the entire bridge structure or just the carriageway.

Hello @Matiz@101 ,
Clearly way/1475062786 is not called "#AfricaMapCup2026". Please correct it. The other things that you added here are presumably not named "building". Please fix those too.
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello, given that the Subway node/13315897177/history#map=19/53.735570/-1.720875 is sharing a building with a Greggs, perhaps it should be https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=fast_food ?

node/11546248533/history was previously disused - has it really been turned back into an operational phone box?

(ah - scratch that - just read the note!)

Has node/8419728991/history really been turned from a public bookcase back into a public telephone?

I've changed way/344512070/history back because "building" is the type of the building (what it was constructed as). It was the only "building:was" in the UK.

Hello,
You've removed some tags from node/1778238591/history . What was the fix here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Bing looks very much like a surface crossing here

Hello,
Creating the crossing left a gap in the "Bristol_Triangular_City_Walk" (relation/2365565). I've filled that in in changeset/180579846 , but you may want to review the route so that it uses the pavement not the road itself: relation/2365565#map=19/51.451984/-2.585362 .

Hello,
relation/11017#map=19/56.735810/-3.770417 is a tiny piece of NCN7 left on the military road - is that deliberate?
It might be useful to use http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=11017 to look at NCN7 .
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello,
Andy from te Data Working Group here. Thanks for tidying up here, but just so that you are aware, there's still quite a bit of "misaligned hedges" etc.
As an example, if you open the editor at osm.org/#map=20/53.1742671/-4.3395658 and show the OSMUK cadastral parcels, you can see that neither the hedge nor the field boundary are especially well aligned here.
Best Regards,
Andy

I also stuck "drinking_water=yes" on the tap based on the existing name.
Also added a fixme because https://www.anniesboathouse.co.uk/ says it has changed hands.

I've also added it to the NCN753 relation, based on the name that you've used - you can see that at relation/2293737#map=17/55.647546/-4.813240 . Does this new route replace the old one through town or is it in addition to it?

I've also added it to the NCN753 relation, based on the name that you've used - you can see that at relation/2293737#map=17/55.647546/-4.813240 . Does this new route replace the old one through town or is it in addition to it?