OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
177115661 10 days ago

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-February/030061.html , and changeset/126152086

176992092 10 days ago

Hello,
Not sure if it was this edit or not, but it looks like relations to NCN2 here fell foul of some of the bugs in iD where you can't see which relation you're adding to (see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/id-visibility-of-relations/138374/2 ). The eastbound route was added to the superrelation relation/1950688 rather than the local section relation/13725878 . I've filled in the gap.
Cheers,
Andy

176995907 10 days ago

Oops - it looks like this introduced a gap in the Lea Valley Walk relation. It added a new bit of footpath that wasn't part of the relation. I've filled it in in changeset/177093285 .
Cheers,
Andy

177016723 10 days ago

Hello,
Just for info (and I know it can be a pain when you're typing in values on your phone) - "accommodation" is spelt with 2 "m"s...
Cheers,
Andy