OpenStreetMap
SimonPoole's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 45449294 | almost 9 years ago | Removed non existant footway |
| 45449350 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45491497
|
| 45449472 | almost 9 years ago | Looks OK |
| 45449715 | almost 9 years ago | Note ways in the forest that are wide enough for two track vehicles should be tagged as tracks, the changes near Holzmatt are probably not correct. |
| 45482407 | almost 9 years ago | Likely OK |
| 45482472 | almost 9 years ago | Footways or landuse seem to be a bit misaligned but otherwise OK |
| 45482547 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45491105 none of the extra tags were necessary. |
| 45482749 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45491012 note: addind school=yes to an amenity school does not make any sense. |
| 45483609 | almost 9 years ago | This is OK |
| 45483731 | almost 9 years ago | This is OK, not really needed on the pedestrian area around the church though. |
| 45484039 | almost 9 years ago | The footway is OK. |
| 45484146 | almost 9 years ago | These are not public footpaths and a bit borderline as such, but can stay. |
| 45484164 | almost 9 years ago | This OK, note that access=yes is the default. |
| 45484326 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45490650 (Bühlstrasse is definitely not a footway) |
| 45484446 | almost 9 years ago | This looks OK, note that bicycle=no and horse=no are the defaults in Switzerland and are unnecessary. |
| 45484547 | almost 9 years ago | These edits seem to be OK. |
| 45485321 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45490272 |
| 45485696 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45490213 |
| 45485840 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45490129 |
| 45485430 | almost 9 years ago | Reverted in changeset/45490071 |