No problem. I've added the barrier to changeset/166520693 if you want to reference.

Right--forgot to add all those in. There is a cement barrier that divides the East/West traffic flow around the I-15 interchange to Digital Dr on Timpanogos Hwy (along with barriers for traffic getting on the northbound connector for I-15 and where the 284 Exit road connects with Ridge Dr at Timpanogos Hwy to allow for East/West connections to Timpanogos Hwy, north-/south-bound I-15, and southbound Thanksgiving Way), a physical barrier that protects the pedestrian bridge pillar between Digital Dr and Triumph Blvd on the same thoroughfare, a physical barrier that protects where the road divides between the highway and the commuter lane, cement islands on Digital Dr at Stockton Ln and the Audi lot due west of Stockton, and a cement island on Digital Drive at the intersection of Ridge Dr. The only other medians in the area are designated by street paint--i.e., the west-bound turn lane on the northbound side of Digital Dr., and the areas not covered by the median at the interchange or the physical barrier between Digital Dr and Triumph Blvd. I'm personally not aware of any plans to add medians along Digital Dr given how narrow the road is, so I think that's more a question for the city engineers.

Corrected.

Mostly added in the direction to the street name for areas where cities name the street differently to help prevent confusion. Where all e-commerce sites rely on the customer to add in the prefixes, and state and federal data is particular about prefixes, not having them attached in the name causes a lot of issues for folks (personal experience from customers chatting to me in newer developments). This is especially true in areas where you have the same house/building number on a road, but different prefixes (e.g., N, S, E, W). Even if you define the prefixes in the metadata, it doesn't always reflect on package or mail labels unless they're specifically inputted by the customer.

Happy to add my input as a former Amazon DSP employee--just need to be directed to the forum in question. Not sure if there's a commenting section on the page you've linked here.

Right. I usually try not to go over a hundred edits at a time, but the change in TIGER boundaries was a bit more intricate than I thought it would be in this area.

I can try to work in Tooele County more frequently, but there are not too many new developments in this area. Was only working out here to verify that the new construction around Stansbury Park was being properly managed.

Was cleaning up the area during this changeset, as there are no plans by UDOT to expand UT-85 further into Foothill Blvd. I don't believe there will be a highway extension of Crossroads connecting to Foothill in the near future, and actually have to adjust the beginning of UT-145 to account for the legal definition of the various highways in the area (Utah Code §72-4-113 for UT-73, Utah Code §72-4-120 for UT-145). The parcel between Foothill and Pioneer Xing seems to belong to the Church (parcels 58:033:0352 and 58:034:0667), so we'll have to wait and see what they do with the land. Hence, anything "proposed" in that area is merely speculation on other mapper's part. 1200 likewise might not get an extension, as that parcel is owned by IHC (42:089:0003). Again, we'll have to wait for construction to complete in the next year or so to know for certain.