SD Mapman 的评论
| 变更集 | 时间 | 评论 |
|---|---|---|
| 175451719 | 19日前 | Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox. |
| 174608641 | 约1个月前 | revert this please |
| 174608641 | 约1个月前 | exactly, subareas are basically useless |
| 168584782 | 约1个月前 | West of US 85 it's a bit confusing too, just updated that as well: changeset/174469148 |
| 168584782 | 约1个月前 | Note that the county road relations were determined to only be needed where the pentagon signs are (mainly along I-25) since everything else is streetblades. See network=US:CO:Weld which I updated to reflect the discussion. |
| 168584782 | 约1个月前 | So when I was investigating the area, I noticed that the addresses along that road were all "14th Street" so that's what I set the 'name' as. Did some further investigation this morning and found streetblade signage for County Road 14 1/2 so I added a segment after the last driveway: changeset/174463722 |
| 144458831 | 3个月前 | Thanks! I did end up updating it, think when I added it in I was going off of the developer's signs which were obviously wrong |
| 144458831 | 3个月前 | Last time I checked, the sign said East 20th, but they could have adjusted it since I last visited Wahoo. Is there a way you can put me in touch with them directly? I'm curious about addressing and road names at the city limits and would like to discuss that with them, this would serve as a good starting point. |
| 172076645 | 3个月前 | the Pierre one is hard to see with the lighting https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=44.367716~-100.352744&lvl=16.4&pi=0.5&style=x&dir=284 |
| 172076645 | 3个月前 | https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=45.574446~-100.485079&lvl=17.2&style=x&pi=-10.3&dir=198.5 |
| 172076645 | 3个月前 | Yeah they are, don't know why SDDOT signed it that way |
| 169751293 | 4个月前 | Also I noticed that you deleted some "name" tags where there were multiple names. Please do not do this. |
| 169751293 | 5个月前 | see relation/19328507 for a "finished" example, I was just planning on only having route relations for the signed portions of the CRs. Also, I think the conclusion was reached that route relations don't need a name if they have a signed ref |
| 169751293 | 5个月前 | So the reason I've been deleting the Weld CR Relations is that the vast majority of them are not signed with pentagons (as opposed to Larimer), and the relation doesn't give any more information than is given in the name tag. I tried to do a "signed/unsigned" distinction similar to how US 85 is, but that just didn't work very well |
| 168767491 | 5个月前 | also thank you! |
| 168767491 | 5个月前 | Last time I looked most of the letters had peeled off, it was more substantial 11 years ago |
| 168767491 | 5个月前 | Don't know, just copied the label that was on it |
| 168767491 | 5个月前 | In my defense I don't think that tag existed 11 years ago (or I didn't look then) |
| 168767491 | 5个月前 | Hey, it looks like this could have been re-tagged with a better tagging scheme instead of deleted (amenity=public_bookcase). Could this be reverted please? |
| 168666744 | 6个月前 | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-automated-road-route-road-name-changes/132498 Please join! |