SD Mapman's Comments
| Changeset | Маца | Коммент |
|---|---|---|
| 175451719 | 20 масех де хьалха | Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox. |
| 174608641 | 1 герг бутт хьалха | revert this please |
| 174608641 | 1 герг бутт хьалха | exactly, subareas are basically useless |
| 168584782 | 1 герг бутт хьалха | West of US 85 it's a bit confusing too, just updated that as well: changeset/174469148 |
| 168584782 | 1 герг бутт хьалха | Note that the county road relations were determined to only be needed where the pentagon signs are (mainly along I-25) since everything else is streetblades. See network=US:CO:Weld which I updated to reflect the discussion. |
| 168584782 | 1 герг бутт хьалха | So when I was investigating the area, I noticed that the addresses along that road were all "14th Street" so that's what I set the 'name' as. Did some further investigation this morning and found streetblade signage for County Road 14 1/2 so I added a segment after the last driveway: changeset/174463722 |
| 144458831 | 3 масех бутт хьалха | Thanks! I did end up updating it, think when I added it in I was going off of the developer's signs which were obviously wrong |
| 144458831 | 3 масех бутт хьалха | Last time I checked, the sign said East 20th, but they could have adjusted it since I last visited Wahoo. Is there a way you can put me in touch with them directly? I'm curious about addressing and road names at the city limits and would like to discuss that with them, this would serve as a good starting point. |
| 172076645 | 3 масех бутт хьалха | the Pierre one is hard to see with the lighting https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=44.367716~-100.352744&lvl=16.4&pi=0.5&style=x&dir=284 |
| 172076645 | 3 масех бутт хьалха | https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=45.574446~-100.485079&lvl=17.2&style=x&pi=-10.3&dir=198.5 |
| 172076645 | 3 масех бутт хьалха | Yeah they are, don't know why SDDOT signed it that way |
| 169751293 | 4 масех бутт хьалха | Also I noticed that you deleted some "name" tags where there were multiple names. Please do not do this. |
| 169751293 | 5 масех бутт хьалха | see relation/19328507 for a "finished" example, I was just planning on only having route relations for the signed portions of the CRs. Also, I think the conclusion was reached that route relations don't need a name if they have a signed ref |
| 169751293 | 5 масех бутт хьалха | So the reason I've been deleting the Weld CR Relations is that the vast majority of them are not signed with pentagons (as opposed to Larimer), and the relation doesn't give any more information than is given in the name tag. I tried to do a "signed/unsigned" distinction similar to how US 85 is, but that just didn't work very well |
| 168767491 | 5 масех бутт хьалха | also thank you! |
| 168767491 | 5 масех бутт хьалха | Last time I looked most of the letters had peeled off, it was more substantial 11 years ago |
| 168767491 | 5 масех бутт хьалха | Don't know, just copied the label that was on it |
| 168767491 | 5 масех бутт хьалха | In my defense I don't think that tag existed 11 years ago (or I didn't look then) |
| 168767491 | 5 масех бутт хьалха | Hey, it looks like this could have been re-tagged with a better tagging scheme instead of deleted (amenity=public_bookcase). Could this be reverted please? |
| 168666744 | 6 масех бутт хьалха | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-automated-road-route-road-name-changes/132498 Please join! |