Made the updates for this. I'll have to run these next time I'm in Brookings, looks interesting

Eh, Strava is good enough for me. Abbreviations are usually spelled out and normal capitalization rules are followed for future reference.

Sounds good, if NDOT went through the effort to change the addresses more power to them (wish SD organizations would too...)

Also would have kept the classifications the same as well, but that's a personal preference.

Hello! Seems mostly reasonable to me. Does way/1547047158 actually have a signed name? If not the name= field should just be empty.

then it would be fine to switch them

Did they update the road names as well? My experience is that if the highway number changes, the road name doesn't (see way/1275022178 and way/9928641 and way/330786276 for example). I would have left the road names as-is even while swapping the highway numbers/relations but if you have sources to the contrary

Hello! I don't know how, but somehow you truncated the overall WY relation for US 89 to just the portion in Afton. Given the changeset comment, this was likely accidental. Could you please revert the change to relation/1506358?

Oh I see, I thought you were getting rid of the numbers. Carry on then. Should have looked at the way histories better first.

Hello! When you are editing these, can you move the values to ref instead of deleting them entirely? Then the local community can decide what to do with them.

Note to anyone reading this, I'm not using Google as the source, just using it because they have a picture of it and I don't but I've been there in person.

https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5022905,-96.7486647,3a,15y,353.11h,96.44t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s_dDcS-aqn6FwdSRD-fTxrw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-6.439541472263684%26panoid%3D_dDcS-aqn6FwdSRD-fTxrw%26yaw%3D353.1141307474197!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDcwNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Yeah, that's where I got these from. They're consistent enough (and Sioux Falls is adding new ones, Exit 2 on I-229 nb on Western) that I think they should go in the name= tag.

Also as a follow-up can you please check the Lakota names I found for places in the Hills? changeset/146998591 has the source I used, which seems to be broken now...

Unrelated to the changeset, but is there a way we can get the English name of the Murray County high point changed to something less generic? Would "Buffalo Ridge" work for the English name or does that refer to the whole ridge?

I disagree with that. This convention aligns with Nebraska, Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming. How exactly the reference number is converted into name depends on the locality, so an address/road name cannot be determined from "ref" without knowing every locality's formatting rules.

Sorry about being short in my response yesterday. I would be open to not including these names if you can give me good solid reasons why these streetblade names should not be included while others are.

Is it silly? Yes. Does it make sense? No. But Sioux Falls includes it with enough regularity that it can be mapped. They've replaced old signs too and kept the block numbers.

I can get pictures for all three interstates showing the Sioux Falls standard block numbering.

This is signed on the street blades. I know that's not how the interstate system works, and I would appreciate not having my intelligence insulted in a changeset comment.

Thanks for the info! That'll be good when I am active in those areas again (unless you get to all the name:dak tags first haha).