RunningSeeds's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 145478311 | Yep, it's definitely a right of way. FYI the Leeds PRoWs can be found here: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/b316214048e04f39933946850f417cc6 Unusually, Leeds also publishes a claimed ways map (basically most are likely to rights of ways but not yet processed) https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/f6b54aecd85d42b7a1509879099eabd8 Additionally, some ways are not documented but may have been adopted by the council and therefore are public https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=27d711fd7172467187621aa2aa628519 Hope the links help - and thanks for being understanding - it's easy to get the wrong end of a stick in short comments :-) |
|
| 145478311 | Hello, sorry to interrupt, but when making updates regarding access, especially private, please could you check if it is a right of way - as simply setting private means routing engines will avoid when there is a legal right. If setting private, please set to allow foot access and others depending on the PRoW type (though happy to stand corrected on markup principles). A brief look at your change history suggests there may be others. Cheers. |