I visited the park but it's impossible to tell what the paths look like with the snow. But there definitely is a playground to the east of the pool. I did find the last change to this park before yours changeset/165045419 8 months ago and it used a gpx data file. I also found my strava activity from april and it agrees with that change from 8 months ago.

Okay, so if I was exploring the area on my bike I should not turn down this road and just keep going?

Is the street access private?

Thanks for you reply. I think it can wait until one of us is able to visit the park in person to confirm.

Did you visit this park this year? I did and my memory is that the paths had changed quite recently and that what was on osm before this changeset was accurate and the aerial imagery was out of date.

So you removed oneway=yes from a lot of roundabouts? Can you put that in the comment? Why did you do that? Is that not the style? Aren't these roundabouts oneway?

Thanks for the additional information about how layer tags work.

So in this case we have roads that are below ground level, roads that are above them and also above ground level, and then roads outside of that area that are at ground level. Saying that these roads on top are layer 0, the same as the roads next to them that are lower at ground level feels weird. Is there a better way to tag it?

Why? Whats the point of dividing this?

I think the layer tags were correct before so I undid this.

I think these ways were already tagged correctly, so I undid this edit.

oneway=no is correct for this street, why remove it?

Again, your comment is false. You changed the type and access of roads only.

You didn't even divide any streets in this changeset. The only change you made was to the access of a road. So your summary comment is completely false! Please do not do that!

Your changeset message is false: you changed some roads from service roads to residential roads.

This changeset also split ways that are administrative boundaries and sidewalks, what is even the point of doing that?

And if you need to make changes to the street it's more work if they are split for no reason.

why do you do this?

The ESRI imagery seems to have the new updates if you don't zoom in too far, that was enough for me to do some improvements. Take a look and see what you think.

Assiniboine forest no longer shows up as green on the default (non-editing) view of osm as a result of this. That seems unexpected.

Thanks. I've combined your trace screnshot with a local visit to add a service road that goes arounds th construction area. It looks to be permanant construction so this should be how this area will look going forward.