halo mas djatmiko.
saya sedang melakukan update informasi desa dan duku jawa tengah.
saya kesulitan untuk menvalidasi keberadaan desa
geneng kulo = https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10967642180
geneng tengah = https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10967642179
geneng wetan = https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10967642178

saya sudah mencoba mencari informasi desa dan dukuh di BIG belum menemukan keberadaan desa tersebut.

saya berharap ada tambahan informasi dari mas djatmiko terkait desa ini?
terimakasih

Hi saigongiadinh1698. thank you for the correction. I do some armchair mapping. I think it takes the same segment with name and class too.
I'll revert to the original one.

thank you

hi Lalit_IAAS, it's glad to connect with you. I do armchair mapping in Nepal regarding clean-up warning error water and highway. I found this landslide polygon. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/964544422

is this refer to landslide area or natural water? I change the tag to natural=landslide. but there are tag
golf=lateral_water_hazard. I am a little bit greeny about this tag.

Perhaps you can provide other information. I would appreciate any information you provide.

thank you

Hi FenyMufyd. thank you for contributing to OSM.
I do armchair to this area. I found several warnings about multipoygon
changeset/133553401

I see a long segment of wood around without a specific area shape only a square in this area nor a specific role in relation.

but multipolygon represents areas (polygons), typically complex areas with holes inside, or consisting of multiple disjoint areas.

I am curious about this area. would you mind coming to recheck? perhaps this common polygon landuse./natural without relation more appropriate.

thank you

hi user_5359. thank you for notifying me of the issue. it is been accidentally added to the tag. I have re-check. it is more proper now. thank you to fixed this

Hi sal73x.
thank you for your outstanding contribution to osm.
I do an armchair validation about relation in maproullete and found
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13487972

I saw your history. you are an advanced mapper in osm. i require some advice for you, i would love to hear your opinion about multipolygon.

1. in my understanding the multi polygon must consist of more than 1. polygon to explain the attachment of 1 object to another object osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon
I wonder, in this case, you changed the common polygon (place island) and turn it into a multi polygon which is only one polygon with one role.

2. the natural coastline little bit unique to draw in osm. natural=coastline
Tagging the coastline is a bit different than with all other features in OSM and Make sure use natural=coastline on ways, not nodes or relations. but the other hand. relation with natural=bare_rock type=multipolygon - and maybe other tags such as name=* + place=islet example
natural=coastline way would be in this relation with outer role

the wiki presents contradictive phrases. make me confused.

in my lack of knowledge. I love to hear your opinion, especially on Pulau Malaka Island. thank you

Hi Krako73.
thanks notice me this issue. I change several member roles in the waterway. because the wiki presents there only 3 member roles. (Mainstream, side stream, and spring). regarding other member roles such as tributary etc, it is no longer used in OSM and causes a new warning in JOSM. it is Misleading and mixes up data about separate watercourses. so I just try to fix the relation type and the roles of each member.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/490493555
I appreciated the suggestions you provide describing the role definition to me.

Warm regards

Hi Relaemanila.
Thanks for contributing a lot to SE Asia OSM data. Especially in Indonesia. I do some validation checks on Indonesia road. I found you add and extend "Jalan Tol Samarinda - Bontang". I wanna ask about
1. I wonder how could you extend the road segment with long geometry across the city.?
2. did you mean to share what reference you used? and determine which direction is? because This road is included in the country's strategic project. the information is limited
3. there's a layer and crossing issue across the "purpose highway"
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103198190
4. the Local news said its delayed project https://www.indonesia-investments.com/news/todays-headlines/infrastructure-indonesia-balikpapan-bontang-toll-road-update/item7417

hope you can share any references, feel free to discuss

Halo Juga Faras. Terimakasih atas respon nya, apakah kamu berkenan untuk me recheck dan menaikan status jalan tol dari konstruksi? dan mungkin memperbaiki sebagian data yang menyebankan crossing oleh jala tol ini?
saya melihat beberapa jalan persimpangan. kamu memberikan tag layer=-1 dan tunnel untuk menghilangkan issue crossing yang ada di sebelah selatan -0.7493339, 100.3011483 dan jembatan -0.7612173, 100.3149607 untuk melewati badan sungai.
terimakasih atas respon dan bantuan nya farras.

Hi ZioDragon
Thank you for your contribution to OSM. I do some maproulette checks about gap name checks. I Trust you are well as a local mapper in Vietnam and you do some improvements to the street name, I need your help to get more information about street names in Vietnam. I have been coming over to fix the road name gap in QL 91 (National Route 91)
.In this history https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/565660903 I found the road name is Quốc lộ 91, y but after I come to cross-check the long segment road about QL 91, I found this road have name Đường Trần Hưng Đạo from vietbando.com
My question is
Which name is more appropriate, Đường Trần Hưng Đạou Lương from vietbando or Quac Lo 91? do you have any reference to the Vietnam name guideline tag to share it?
After I’ve come across Quac Lo 91. I do some improvements to the road name, would you mind coming back and reviewing my improvement to eliminate the road gap name?
Is there any standard of road naming in Vietnam? For example, I’m a little bit green to determine standard naming in Vietnam. Which prefer QL 91 or Quac Lo 91? Which prefer Đường tỉnh or Just DT?
I do some improvements in Vietnam refer to http://maps.vietbando.com/ and osm.wiki/Vietnam_Tagging_Guidelines
I really appreciate every piece of information you give. I do some armchair mapping in Vietnam.
Regards
==========================

Chào ZioDragon
Cảm ơn bạn đã đóng góp cho OSM. Tôi thực hiện một số kiểm tra maproulette về kiểm tra tên khoảng cách. Tôi tin rằng bạn cũng là một người vẽ bản đồ địa phương ở Việt Nam và bạn đang thực hiện một số cải tiến đối với tên đường, tôi cần sự giúp đỡ của bạn để có thêm thông tin về tên đường ở Việt Nam. Tôi đã về để sửa khoảng trống tên đường ở QL 91 (QL 91)
.Trong lịch sử này https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/565660903 Mình thấy tên đường là Quốc lộ 91 y chang nhưng sau khi mình đi chéo đoạn đường dài khoảng QL 91, Tôi thấy đường này có tên Đường Trần Hưng Đạo từ vietbando.com
Câu hỏi của tôi là
Tên nào thích hợp hơn, Đường Trần Hưng Đạo Lương từ vietbando hay Quắc Lộ 91? bạn có tài liệu tham khảo nào về thẻ hướng dẫn tên Việt Nam để chia sẻ nó không?
Sau khi tôi đi qua Quắc Lộ 91. Tôi làm một số cải tiến tên đường, bạn vui lòng quay lại và xem xét cải tiến của tôi để loại bỏ tên đường khoảng cách?
Ở Việt Nam đã có tiêu chuẩn đặt tên đường chưa? Ví dụ như I’m little green để xác định cách đặt tên chuẩn ở Việt Nam. Thích QL 91 hay Quắc Lộ 91 hơn? Bạn thích Đường tỉnh hay Chỉ cần DT?
Tôi làm một số cải tiến ở Việt Nam tham khảo http://maps.vietbando.com/ và osm.wiki/Vietnam_Tagging_Guidelines
Tôi thực sự đánh giá cao mọi thông tin bạn cung cấp. Tôi làm một số bản đồ ghế bành ở Việt Nam.
Trân trọng

Hi SIDOL JK
Thank you for your contribution to OSM. I do some map roulette check about gap name check. I Trust you well as a local mapper in Vietnam. I need your help to get more information about street names in Vietnam. I have been coming over fixing the road name gap in QL 91 (National Route 91)
.In this history https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/142896086 I found the road name is Tân Lộ Kiều Lương, you mention getting the data referring to angiang.gov.vn. but after I come to cross-check the long segment road about QL 91, I found this road have name Quac Lo 91 from vietbando.com
My question is
Which name is more appropriate, Tân Lộ Kiều Lương from angiang.gov.vn or Quac Lo 91 from vietbando.com?
After I’ve come across QL 91. I do some improvements to the road name, would you mind coming back and reviewing my improvement to eliminate the road gap name
Is there any standard of road naming in Vietnam? For example, I’m a little bit green to determine standard naming in Vietnam. Which prefer QL 91 or Quac Lo 91?
I do some improvements in Vietnam refer to maps.vietbando.com and osm.wiki/Vietnam_Tagging_Guidelines
I really appreciate every piece of information you give. I do some armchair mapping in Vietnam.
Regards

====================

Xin chào SIDOL JK
Cảm ơn bạn đã đóng góp cho OSM. Tôi làm một số kiểm tra roulette bản đồ về kiểm tra tên lỗ hổng. Tôi tin tưởng bạn cũng như một người lập bản đồ địa phương ở Việt Nam. Tôi cần sự giúp đỡ của bạn để có thêm thông tin về tên đường phố ở Việt Nam. Tôi đã qua sửa khoảng trống tên đường ở QL 91 (QL 91)
.Vào history này https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/142896086 mình thấy tên đường là Tân Lộ Kiều Lương, bạn đề cập lấy dữ liệu tham khảo angiang.gov.vn. nhưng sau khi đi chéo đoạn đường dài về QL 91 thì thấy đường này có tên Quắc Lộ 91 từ vietbando.com
Câu hỏi của tôi là
Cái tên nào thích hợp hơn, Tân Lộ Kiều Lương từ angiang.gov.vn hay Quắc Lộ 91 từ vietbando.com?
Sau khi đi qua QL 91. Tôi làm một số cải tiến tên đường, bạn vui lòng quay lại và xem xét cải tiến của tôi để loại bỏ tên đường
Ở Việt Nam đã có tiêu chuẩn đặt tên đường chưa? Ví dụ như I’m little green để xác định cách đặt tên chuẩn ở Việt Nam. Thích QL 91 hay Quắc Lộ 91 hơn?
Tôi làm một số cải tiến ở Việt Nam tham khảo maps.vietbando.com và osm.wiki/Vietnam_Tagging_Guidelines
Tôi thực sự đánh giá cao mọi thông tin bạn cung cấp. Tôi làm một số bản đồ ghế bành ở Việt Nam.
Trân trọng

Hi Faras. Terimakasih telah berkontribusi Aktif pada OSM.
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk validasi jaringan kereta api yang ada di Indonesia.
saya membutuhkan bantuanmu terutama untuk rel kereta api ini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1098293368 )

Saya melihat pada history changeset kamu menambahkan tag Construction Motorway (-0.7172559, 100.3048558).
berdasarkan history jalan motorway (construction) yang ada, construction motorway ini menyebabkan beberapa warning crossing pada beberapa segment jalan, sungai dll. apakah ada mempunya informasi untuk menghilangkan warning error yang terjadi selama segment jalan ini atau adakah cara lain agar jalan construction tersebut tidak menimbulkan warning dan error.
saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang kamu berikan.
Terima kasih

thanks for your response varman.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/872071312.
through the information, you give
the rail and highway in the same layer. so do I delete layer=1 in this case and don't need the bridge tag as you said

it is helpful, I Appreciate that. Happy Mapping

Hi varman. Thank you for contributing to OSM. I came across this area. I Found an issue about layer tags in the railway. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/872071312. There's a layer tag without a bridge, based on history you delete the bridge tag but the layer tag still exists. I would like to fix this issue but I am not sure how to fix such an armchair mapper. If you have any other suggestions. Please let me know.
https://maproulette.org/challenge/30168/task/143786124
Cheers

Hi Kri_ttt. Thank to contributing OSM, you are mapping around Benchakitti Forest Park. I came across this changeset
changeset/130630905#map=17/13.73031/100.55530
changeset/129815106#map=17/13.72645/100.55457 you modified the waterbody around thies park.
I think tag natural water didn't tag properly and I found several issue highway crossings due to your water tagging.
After I rechecked various satellite imagery, there’s a swamp. The tag natural=wetland and wetland swamp is more appropriate, perhaps wetland=swamp . the multipolygon you made with islet, is miss understanding about islet, it should be just tree natural=tree
On the street level I can't find natural water
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=13.730595816766595&lng=100.55387705085195&z=17.772596377802856
In other words, the footway around this swamp. Is it any bridge Or manmade to come across around inner swamp park? Or just a simple pedestrian? I would appreciate it if you could give me information. I would like to fix this issue, but I am not sure of such an armchair mapper.
Cheers

hi Konmuang
Thanks for contributing to osm. I see your focus and concern to improve data in Thailand. I do armchair mapper and come across Mondol Seima. I wonder, you improve the coastline to wetland tidal https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/313960965 to https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/999814281 . I found there are several issues about crossing water. There is a path crossing into the wetland you made. (Id way/326921806), the land use residential comes overlapping with tidal wetland. I think tag wetland isn't appropriate in this area. The area doesn't present the warning and error in JOSM. Is there an area affected by tidal/ flood in season? If yes, i think additional tag such as tidal=yes or flood prone is necessary to fixing the issue
tidal=*
flood_prone=*

But if you have any other suggestions, feel free to discuss.
Happy mapping

awesome. thanks for improvement. happy mapping

Hi nitinatsangsit,

thank you for contributing in osm. i trust you well in mapping as local mapper and i do believe you have more local knowledge in this area
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1090716585 I've been come across armchair mapping in this area. I found overlapping way in the primary road (Thinanon Road). would you mind to come recheck in this area? I appreciate if you could fix this issue.
please let me know if you any suggestion.

cheers

hi irma and buddy.
let me get into very interesting discussion.

after seeing the mapillary above, i think the main issue . the water body didn't mapped properly. its cause crossing issue with path (step) idWay 1105907662 with idWay 557349691 . you can check esry imagery, its more clear than maxar/bing

other hand, the the step (bridge) road didn't draw properly. the segmentation isn't quite right https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-6.270241709301&lng=106.74025713363&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=2567176680245336&x=0.5800726904255502&y=0.6415151544877884&zoom=0

so I do some improvement. https://osmcha.org/changesets/130099939/. i think it can be resolve the issue. let me know if any suggestion.

feel free to discuss. cheers all

hi baconscrisp and irma

this issue intrigued me to join discussion. the link pewu above (irma's said) doesn't match with @baconcrisp did. i think this might this way https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/569517949 and irma did some improvement of "service road" not footway. (golf area)

other hand @baconscrip did tag of footway in southern area https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9990970772 and he did exact the mapillary's photos.

am i right? or any suggestion, where's the footway mean @baconscrisp?

feel free to discuss . cheers