Hi, noticed that in this edit you added a highway=via_ferrata to a node that is a small distance away from a way called "via_ferrata" - so I merged the edits and hope it is ok like this - see
changeset/64582265

Is there a particular reason why oyu have retagged the ferrata as highway=path ?

Also über highway=path vs highway=via_ferrata haben wir uns schon vortrefflich gestritten, aber ausgerechnet dieses Objekt scheint nicht zu denen zu gehören die man als gutes Beispiel für "highway=path" bezeichnen könnte.

Und wenn schon highway=path verwendet wird dann auf jeden Fall zusammen mit sac_scale - router die highway=path auswerten sind nicht verpflichtet via_ferrata_scale zu kennen und auszuwerten und viele tun das vermutlich auch nicht.

@zstadler: most of the nodes natural=cave should be natural=cave_entrance but not all. It may be that in Israel the data is sufficiently homogenous that you can simply replace it but in other countries I found mappers tagged wine cellars, restaurants and many other objects with nodes of type natural=cave so it needs some manual checking.

Habe es geändert und vorsichtshalber den OC angeschrieben.

changeset/48558910

Bin leider auch nicht von dort, habe es jetzt so verschoben wie es mit Bing aussieht aber im Zweifelsfall lasse ich lieber einen offensichtlichen Fehler drinstehen als einen gut versteckten.

Irgednwie passt auch die "Flussrichtung" vom Flutgraben und dem verbundenen ditch nicht gut zusammen.

Thanks, I have started osm.wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave and am looking at those places now

The reverted changeset clearly had some errors but I think many of the objects are in fact cave_entrances.

war ausnahmsweise auf Bing unübersehbar eindeutig, keine Mühe machen.

Aber gerne, weißt Du zufällig ob an der Stelle ein Culvert, eine Brücke oder ein Ford ist?

Übrigens bin ich nicht der "Verursacher" wie in Deinem dem Keepright Kommentar vermerkt und es ist auch nicht ein "Fehler" sondern eine Warnung.

sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here.

sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here.

In this changeset I tried to fix JOSM warnings where the river crosses the lake shore and dam.

Btw I do try to contact the main contributors when I am doing larger scale retagging.

Thanks for having an eye on it, I am also making mistakes often enough.

I am always trying to contact the individual authors whose data I am changing by private message and work in small chunks - however in this one case I have accidentaly uploaded too much at once. I am pretty sure that I have contacted most of the affected contributors though.

the nudism proposal did not include the value "designated", but as it seems quite frequent I have added a description. Please check nudism=*#Tagging if the decription is ok.

Indeed, it has been requested already - https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/662

thanks. I was also looking at way/37264089/history but does not seem to have the possibility to link a specific version directly.

So the overpass query seems like the only way to get a stable pointer.

there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?

Btw besides fixing this one bridge I have intended to contact the author of the unlucky mechanical edit causing this because there are a few thousands of bridges with layer=-1 in Italy. It is surprising to see how long they lasted without anyone noticing.

Hi, you have accidentally deleted the coastline of Huahine Iti so I am reverting this changeset.

Don't hesitate to ask for help when editing and wish you better luck next time.