Updated with changeset/149516243

Hi Mottiger,
You're right, capacity=1 is implicit, so I removed it.
Best regards,
Rémi

Top, merci beaucoup pour ta correction rapide.
Oui, j'avais participé à cette discussion mais ils n'avaient pas l'air de comprendre la problématique de cette mauvaise interprétation... N'hésite pas y mettre ton avis, peut être que ça relancera la discussion.
A+
Rémi

Hello Amadeous,
Pour info les AED de la Migros ne sont pas réservés aux clients (source : https://vaud.migros.ch/fr/actualites/22_defibrillateurs.html), du coup la modification access=customers n'est pas correcte.
Donc si tu es ok, il faudrait remettre access=yes.
A disposition pour en discuter.
Rémi

Oh I see, thanks for the details :)

And for the job of course!

Hi Christian,
Thanks for the answer.
I was also wondering if you have checked if some AED weren't already mapped at the time of the import, to avoid having duplicates.
For information, it's always a good practice to contact the community before a bulk import, see osm.wiki/Import
Best regards,
Rémi

Hi Christian,
Are you sure that ALL stores have an AED? Did you discuss about this mass import with the OSM community before doing it? And what is your source?
Thanks for your answer,
Rémi

Top ! Merci pour ta réactivité

Salut Vince!
Je pense qu'il y a un soucis avec ta modification sur way/198205080, ça ne devrait pas être tagué en `building=yes`
A+
Rémi

Hi Christian,
Is the tag emergency:phone documented somewhere? I can't find anything in the wiki.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
Rémi

You're welcome and thanks for your message. Yes, that's the strength of the OSM community ;)

Hello Stéphane,
En me basant sur le wiki [1], j’enlèverai le building et mettrai en tourism=attraction
[1] historic=ship

"Feel free to do it" si on les voit sur l'imagerie satellite ;)

Pour le nom je ne sais pas, c'est du ressort des communes. Il faudrait voir sur place.

Thanks both of you for your inputs. If you agree, we can continue the discussion on the mailing list http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2018-January/004574.html

Hi BAK365,
Because with no protocol defined, it was automaticaly translated to HTTP by some viewers (not all, and some only if the URL starts with WWW).
The goal here was to set all links "clickable", even those not starting with WWW.
And if the website is well configured, it should redirect to HTTPS if exists, which was the behaviour before my edits.
Is that looking good for you or not?
Rémi

Hi StreetAv,
I'm sorry if I hurt you with my comment, be sure that it was not my intention to be rude with you. It was a short text but not aggressive, my apologies if you received it like that.
Yes, I think I'm helping the OSM community with my warning. Even if like you say that mappers are rare today (what are your sources?), it is not a reason to use copyrighted data. Should I remember you that "OSM contributors are reminded never to add data from any copyrighted sources (e.g. Google Maps or printed maps) without explicit permission from the copyright holders." [1] and like I said before, mapnv.ch is using cantonal data for the buildings [2].
So my point here is not to discourage members to add content to the map but to avoid that mappers use uncompatible data for mapping.
[1] osm.org/copyright/en
[2] https://www.asitvd.ch/chercher/geoservices/fond-de-plan-asit-vd.html

Do you know that mapnv.ch use cantonal data for the buildings, source which is not compatible with OSM data...

J'ai l'impression que le Château n'est plus rendu depuis tes essais, je te laisser regarder pour régler ça?

Par contre es-tu sûr du oneway=yes pour way/25094765 way/88969215 way/25652149 way/88969189

J'ai peaufiné via changeset/47211417