Mistakenly uploaded redundant Everydoor changeset from last week edits, will revert later

Hmmm, Im actually not sure about that one. You could probably keep it in there for ease of searchability and someone else could chime in afterwards. Although I'd probably pass by the documentation one more time just to be sure.

Hi yeah, `addr:lot` is a more recent addition so it might not be widely supported or tagged but it is valid and it does represent the actual address of the houses correctly.
While the older tagging methods are *also* themselves, valid but as you can see even within the blog posts, there are variations within them with their own pros and cons, personally I believe its whether you want to go for it being easily searchable or having the right addressing on the meta level.
Cheers.

Hi, just a little comment of correction. The building tags are right except for :housenumber.

The right tag for these would be `addr:block=*` and `addr:lot=*`
Happy mapping

Oh alright, thanks for clarifying. Sure, you may go ahead and add those back in. I have confirmed on the ground that these roads do exists and I have also now mapped the parking building which is adjacent to the transport terminal (which is a dual use building as the terminal section is on the ground floor while the parking for mall customers are on the 2nd floor)

Hi...? What is this changeset?

Note: correction to changeset/157824955

This has now been fixed :)
changeset/169699745

Hi yes, thanks for catching the problem. @ivanbranco. This is indeed an error, I believe I was supposed to list this https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q161070 instead. This the current wikidata tag is a mistake.

Hi Thanks! I'm very motivated to keep improving the mapping quality (though survey or aerial) of my city :D

Hello, who is the developer that proposed development for this parcel?

Bing Aerial*

Oops, wrong copy-paste source.