OK. I don't see anything confusing on the current solution of bridges, but I see you are strictly following the theoretical rules whereas I am thinking more practically of enriching the factual information value provided to map users. If I do like you, I could argue that the zoo is on the OSM wiki defined: "A zoo is a place that has confined animals on display for viewing by the public." ... which technically is not false in our case.
hazard=dogs seems reasonable, I just did not find it within the official OSM tags, so I guess it will be useless as the map renderers will not show it anyway.
Anyway, I'll solve the issues as suggested.

1. The best solution here would be to add exact names of the bridges, as most of them typically have some local name which local people use to refere them based on nearby villages or rivers. And it would be even veneficial as people informing about bridges could clearly identify each. But as far as I was not completely sure about most of the names, I rather used a general term, which seems to me only provides an additional benefit without any drawback here.

2. OK. I'm really not sure about this case as I'm currently in the terrain surveying without my laptop. But possibly there was neither ford nor bridge mapped in the place before, just the path crossing the stream, and based on an ortophoto image I identified a bridge with a good hope it is still there. I would not draw a bridge at places where a ford is already mapped or with no indication of a bridge beeing there.

3. That is kind of a responsibility of ChatGPT generalising and not examining the sources deeply, but I see your point.

1. Our case is very far from what wrong examples are mentioned on the link provided. The point is that most map renderers simply do not label or show any tags except the name tag. And so, sometimes adding valuable information of what kind or state of a bridge or another object is might be the only way how to provide such information to hikers (as the note or description tags are not typically displayed). This includes map renderers e.g. Mapy.com, FreeMapSK etc. Which object has name and which does not is a bit questionable of course, but generally this is an attribute which becomes a label in most maps. And as mentioned, for example the Mapy.com renderer (which is very frequently used in the region) makes for labeled bridges a possibility to add photos, rankings etc. And while in most of the world it is not usefull to have such functionality for each bridge, in Georgian mountains this is quite crucial to plan your hike.
2. In this exact case, this was not visited, so this bridge was probably only based on ortofoto images or an already mapped bridge was just edited to enrich the precision. Most of the data in this region is very outdated, so I do my best to improve it based on a variety of sources as not all were visited personally. And within this process, sometimes an incorrect piece of information might result in a wrong content. Please, if you have a recent experience, update it the same as I updated plenty of no more existing bridges, paths and mapped the new ones in contrary.

3. Yes, the feature is an area with a high probability of occurence of shepherds dogs, which is clearly noted using other tags. Please, if you have a better fitting tag resulting in a map representation which becomes clearer in maps, update it.

The all I do is trying to make the maps really useful for hikers in the region. I'm sorry, if some of my updates complicated your hike. But I can assure you, that most of the map content in Tusheti Region is strongly outdated, unprecise and frequently wrong, and so I also experienced there a huge variety of non-yet-existing and unprecise features in July, which someone probably put there in order to at least try to provide a schematic infrastructure map, despite ir was not precise in all aspects.

Hello. Related to all mentioned changes, these were done to add valuable information for hiking based on current experience in a way to be visible also on external maps sourcing from OSM. That's why bridges were additionaly named "bridge"/"footbridge" to enable additional functuonality in external maps, enabling adding photos and reviews there, which is so valuable in this region where situation changes every while. This functionality is only available for bridges with a name tag. You're right the Georgian name is more correct there, I'll correct this ASAP. Regarding the destroyed bridge, I hope it was marked destroyed or restricted to walk. Regarding the ZOO, please let me know if there is any other better-fitting tag to capture areas where specific animals are kept while being very important for hikers to know about them. The name tag here clearly identifies what kind of a "zoo" it is.

Hello, I haven't mapped pedestrian crossings, but paths used for connecting the sidewalks. And I cannot agree with your arguments as:
- they are located on natural connecting lines of the sidewalk network and used by people to cross the roads there (so when missing, it strongly devalues the OSM network)
- it is legal to cross the road if there is no official pedestrian crossing nearby, as far as I know
- whether crossing the road is safe or not is strongly dependent on many temproal factors (e. g. traffic density at the time, walker's/runner's skills, etc.) and cannot and should not be evaluated by a cartographer

To be honest, it was a pleasure to explore it as this train stop is simply legendary :-D And while doing it, we met there an elderly railway worker using the path regularly to get home from his job. So it was a perfect Balcan story.

Zdraví
Radek Barvíř

Díky moc za doplnění.

Hezký den, úsek železnice jsem musel smazat omylem, nebyl to určitě záměr. Již jsem chybu napravil a úsek je znovu zakreslený.
Co se týká zakreslených pěšin, ty v reálu opravdu existují, a proto byly podle jejich skutečného stavu zakresleny odpovídajícím klíčem highway=path. To, že může být vstup do okolí železnice nebezpečný či zakázaný, je jistě pravda, ale mapa zakresluje stav krajiny takový, jaký je. Informace o nebezpečí/zákazu lze případně uvést do popisu. Není to ale důvod k tomu, aby pěšina zaznačena nebyla. V Tatrách je také zaznačena řada pěšin, na které je zakázán vstup, a není smysluplné je co půl roku mazat a znovu obnovovat, protože někomu v krizové situaci mohou i přes zákaz poskytnout cenný orientační prvek.